We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
main driver??
ad77
Posts: 1 Newbie
i have 2 cars both cars are in may name, and i am the main driver on both insurances, however my partner drives one and i use the other. is this legal???
0
Comments
-
If your partner is the main driver of one of the cars, then the insurer for that car needs to be told (that will make it "legal")0
-
Probably not. Is there a reason why your partner doesn't have insurance in their name on the car that they drive?
You haven't given enough detals for us to answer your question properly but if you google 'fronting' you'll find it might not be the best idea.0 -
Pink-winged wrote: »Probably not. Is there a reason why your partner doesn't have insurance in their name on the car that they drive? ......
There is no reason why the "main driver" has to also be the "policyholder"!0 -
There is no reason why the "main driver" has to also be the "policyholder"!
Where did I say that the main driver had to be the ''policyholder''?
Op has stated that they are listed as the main driver on both cars, when in fact they are not...their partner is the main driver on one of the vehicles and really should declare this.0 -
i have 2 cars both cars are in may name, and i am the main driver on both insurances, however my partner drives one and i use the other. is this legal???
If your partner drives significantly more miles than you in one of the cars, and has done so since the policy started, then no - it's not legal.
You've made a false statement to obtain motor insurance, which is an offence under s174 (5) RTA 1988 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/174
The policy could be voided if you try to make a claim; then the driver may have to pay any third party costs themselves.
Look at the case studies here to see how the FOS treats this sort of non-disclosure: http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/7/july-innocent-non-disclosure.htm (hint: the complaints are nearly always rejected)We need the earth for food, water, and shelter.
The earth needs us for nothing.
The earth does not belong to us.
We belong to the Earth0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards