We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Under 25 housing benefit

«13456712

Comments

  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    I thought all these separate benefits were being replaced by universal credit or something.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Raises an interesting debate. As to cut the budget deficit there's going to be tough choices ahead. Most likely at the next general election.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 June 2012 at 4:29PM
    I’ve heard a lot about the universal benefit but haven’t seen much detail on how it will be worked out. But I would imaging it must have an element toward housing.

    Personally I don’t think it is fair to remove the benefit from one age group.
    I can’t see how you can defend giving all pensioners WFA and bus passes while at the same time making some under 25s homeless.
  • mark55man
    mark55man Posts: 8,221 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm worried about sounding like a Tory fat cat, but unless there is a need (and we can all think of many scenarios where this is the case) I don't think just wanting to move out from mum and dad's qualifies for a benefit.

    If you have the cash from your own efforts fine - but I don't see this as a something to be universally available
    I think I saw you in an ice cream parlour
    Drinking milk shakes, cold and long
    Smiling and waving and looking so fine
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    I think its not a bad idea.

    Perhaps this would drive parents to make sure there kids were employable and employed.

    The cycle of generations unemployed has to be broken.
  • TSx
    TSx Posts: 867 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 8 October 2012 at 11:56AM
    mark88man wrote: »
    I'm worried about sounding like a Tory fat cat, but unless there is a need (and we can all think of many scenarios where this is the case) I don't think just wanting to move out from mum and dad's qualifies for a benefit.

    If you have the cash from your own efforts fine - but I don't see this as a something to be universally available

    What about those (like me) who move somewhere to go to university, get a job, pay tax and then lose their job at 23.

    My parents didn't have the space for me as they've moved to a smaller house - and they live 300 miles away. I also had a tenancy agreement with another 7 months to run - would the government support me in just ripping it up?

    Don't get me wrong, I don't expect to get something for nothing, and I would prefer a contributions based system (you pay money in, you get help when you need it) like with contribution based JSA, but it's not just as simple as "you're 23, you can live with your parents"

    As it happens, I got a job after 3 months on benefits, and I've since paid back several times over the amount I received from the government (not that it's a savings scheme).
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    So are the Tories saying we'll need more spending cuts after the election, and do they expect to win the election on that sort of programme?
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • Loopgames
    Loopgames Posts: 805 Forumite
    What happen when under 25s dont have parents?
  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Loopgames wrote: »
    What happen when under 25s dont have parents?
    They would get about £60 a week towards a room in a shared house. That will not stop.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 June 2012 at 6:16PM
    HappyMJ wrote: »
    They would get about £60 a week towards a room in a shared house. That will not stop.

    As that is all they get now I think they must be talking about stopping that.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.