PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Liability for roof?

I currently own/ live in a property that was converted many years ago into one lower and one upper 1/4 villa. I own the lower and whenever there has been problems with the roof my neighbour upstairs has been telling me I am liable for half of it. However, recently someone mentioned that if they have converted the roof/ loft space into bedrooms then I shouldnt be liable, does anyone know if this is the case?
«1

Comments

  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    If you were living in a purpose built block of flats, there would normally be a service charge and a management agreement in place. The former collects a monthly charge from each individual flat that pays for common area costs (lighting, cleaning etc) as well as maintenance of common parts and the external building fabric including walls, windows, foundations and , strangely enough, the roof. This is because all of the flats benefit directly or indirectly from maintenance on the walls, roof etc. therefore all flat owners are jointly responsible.

    In your case, both of your flats benefit from the walls being maintained, along with the roof and the foundations. Therefore I would suggest it wouldne appropriate for both of you to contribute. Also remember, there may be a time when you need to do work on the foundations and may wish to seek contributions from the upstairs flat owner.
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • loubel
    loubel Posts: 1,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Your starting point should be your Lease. Do you still have the paperwork from your solicitor from when you bought? This should explain how maintenance costs are split.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why not read the lease you bought to see what your liabilities are?

    I'm afraid I'm not psychic, so can't read it from here!
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I live in a ground floor flat and when there is work needed to the roof I am liable to pay 1/4. Conversely when work was needed on the drains upstairs had to pay 1/2. There are four flats.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I live in a ground floor flat and when there is work needed to the roof I am liable to pay 1/4. Conversely when work was needed on the drains upstairs had to pay 1/2. There are four flats.

    Quite a common arrangement. But it doesn't help the OP.

    His lease may be totally different to yours.
  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,844 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As others have mentioned, you need to read your lease to see how maintenance charges are approportioned.

    If your neighbour has extended into the roof/loft space, then they must own it. It either would have been part of the property from the outset, or the freeholder sold the loft space to the leaseholder to enable them to extend.

    Owning the roof/loft space doesn't mean they own the roof, only the void under the roof.

    Sometimes people do assume they own this space by the very fact that they own the top floor flat and extend up there 'illegally' when it might not even be part of their property.

    It's possible that your neighbour is in fact the freeholder, but you do need to acqaint yourself with who the freeholder is and what is what with regards to maintenance by going through your lease.
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    G_M wrote: »
    Quite a common arrangement. But it doesn't help the OP.

    His lease may be totally different to yours.

    I don't have a lease though I own my flat outright.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 23 June 2012 at 6:22PM
    I don't have a lease though I own my flat outright.

    :rotfl:

    Yes you do!

    You have bought the rights to live in the flat for... 99 years? 80 years? 125 years? (you need to read your lease to find out!)

    The land on which the building stands, and the structure of the building, is owned by a 'freeholder'.

    The freeholder sells each flat owner a lease to live in their particular flat for a set period of years (which diminishes as the years pass), (and the original leaseholder can then sell the lease - ie the flat - to another person. This is what you bought)

    The lease also specifies who pays for what in the building (eg the roof!), and who has what rights within the building.

    If you go to the Land Registry site here, and put in your address, it will show:

    * Freehold Title and
    * Leasehold Title

    If you pay £4 for the leasehold title, you will find your name shown as the owner. (if you pay another £4 you can find out who owns the Freehold!)

    (I believe things may be different if you are in Scotland).

    In a very few cases, I believe there are flats in England with no lease, but these are impossible to get mortgages on, so almost impossible to buy/sell.

    edit: ps.
    If the owner of the lease (flat) upstairs, has "converted the roof/ loft space into bedrooms" they would need the permission of the Freeholder to do this.
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    G_M wrote: »
    :rotfl:

    Yes you do!

    You have bought the rights to live in the flat for... 99 years? 80 years? 125 years? (you need to read your lease to find out!)

    The land on which the building stands, and the structure of the building, is owned by a 'freeholder'.

    The freeholder sells each flat owner a lease to live in their particular flat for a set period of years (which diminishes as the years pass), (and the original leaseholder can then sell the lease - ie the flat - to another person. This is what you bought)

    The lease also specifies who pays for what in the building (eg the roof!), and who has what rights within the building.

    If you go to the Land Registry site here, and put in your address, it will show:

    * Freehold Title and
    * Leasehold Title

    If you pay £4 for the leasehold title, you will find your name shown as the owner. (if you pay another £4 you can find out who owns the Freehold!)

    (I believe things may be different if you are in Scotland).

    In a very few cases, I believe there are flats in England with no lease, but these are impossible to get mortgages on, so almost impossible to buy/sell.

    edit: ps.
    If the owner of the lease (flat) upstairs, has "converted the roof/ loft space into bedrooms" they would need the permission of the Freeholder to do this.

    I'm in Scotland! :rotfl:

    Find it really strange that you own a property for a set time as the land isn't yours. My flat is all mine.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 23 June 2012 at 8:02PM
    I'm in Scotland! :rotfl:

    Find it really strange that you own a property for a set time as the land isn't yours. My flat is all mine.

    Ah there you go! Hoisted by my own petard! ( what is a 'petard'?)

    From what I understand (limited) in Scotland there is frequently a managing agent or 'factor' who manages the mainenance/repairs etc, and in other cases there are informal arrangements made by the different flat owners.

    English system seems far clearer, with a lease specifying who is responsible for what!

    There's a thread here.

    And Scottish legal dictionary here.

    Responsibility for repairs and maintenance in common areas in scotland

    edit. Found it.!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.