We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Confused - purchased flat with new lease but only 98 yrs

Hi all, I completed on my flat on 22nd March, as part of the sale the vendor extended the lease to 99 years. The 10grand or so, came from my purchase with a mortgage. The lender would only lend if it had 99 year lease and this is shown on the offer.

The sale was done, and the other day I got my deeds in the post. On it it showed the new lease signed on the completion date, but extended from March 22nd 2011 :mad: So giving me 98 years.

I checked my sale of contract and it does say extended from that date. I miss read the year, I queried this with my solicitor who just said the Lease was extended to 99 years and you purchased at98 years. i did point out my mortgage offer is for a 99 year lease.

Why extended it back a year or is this normal?

Cheers all.

Comments

  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    It was 99 years until 22-3 2012. If you completed after that date it was 98 years and x days.

    I suspect they too the original date of grant, 22 March XXXX and added Y years to make it 99 at 2011.

    Just a lack of specificness at negotiation stage.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sue your solicitor!

    No!, sue the seller!

    No! Sue the Land Registry!

    There must be someone you can sue!

    Or (to follow the example on another recent thread) call the police as you've been robbed of a year!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.