We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fined £275 for watching YOUTUBE

13132333537

Comments

  • Cornucopia wrote: »
    We can only speculate about how many (how few) of those people knew that they did not have to speak to "TVL".

    I suspect the right to ignore them is less well known than we might imagine.

    On a number of occasions, I've been asked what I will do when they visit me, to which I've replied "I'll ignore them, close the window and go back to whatever I was doing", to which they've responded "You can't do that. You have to let them in".

    I've had a number of conversations with people who have been summonsed, after signing a TVL178, who say they only spoke to therm/let them in/signed the form, because "I thought I had to"/"I didn't know I could refuse".

    It's interesting to note that, the right to refuse entry is stated on the licence, but not on the Threat-O-Grams.

    It's almost as though they don't want unlicensed people to know their rights :huh:
  • pineapple
    pineapple Posts: 6,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 June 2012 at 11:57AM
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    If a police officer believes a crime is being committed, he can enter a premises.
    Why bring police officers into it?
    Just a reminder to anybody new to the discussion, Capita are NOT the police. And they have as much authority as the skin on a rice pudding. :D
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,553 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Bedsit_Bob wrote: »
    It's almost as though they don't want unlicensed people to know their rights :huh:

    They don't - I have a complaint response from someone high up in the BBC who essentially said: we don't tell people because we believe it would increase evasion and make enforcement harder.
  • pineapple wrote: »
    Why bring police officers into it?
    Just a reminder to anybody new to the discussion, Capita are NOT the police. And they have as much authority as the skin on a rice pudding. :D

    It does seem rather strange considering it's been pointed out to him before that it's nothing to do with the Police. The Police will only attend to stop a breach of the peace
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    pineapple wrote: »
    Why bring police officers into it?
    Just a reminder to anybody new to the discussion, Capita are NOT the police. And they have as much authority as the skin on a rice pudding. :D

    You need read more of the thread.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,553 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    You need read more of the thread.

    This is not helpful. Either make a point or don't make a post.

    The Police are not involved in licence fee enforcement. That is a fact.

    "TV Licensing" do not have Police powers. That is also a fact.

    I'm not sure what else there is to say about the Police in this context, but perhaps you will enlighten us?
  • pineapple
    pineapple Posts: 6,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 June 2012 at 5:41PM
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    You need read more of the thread.
    I've read enough to know that you seem to remain fixatedly on the side of the abuse of non existent authority. ;)
    It's a bit strange but hey ho, we are all entitled to our opinion.
    Maybe you live in a black and white universe where anyone questionning Capita methods must be a licence dodging, fee dodging chav.
    It must be a much simpler world - I almost envy you ;)
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Cornucopia wrote: »
    This is not helpful. Either make a point or don't make a post.

    The Police are not involved in licence fee enforcement. That is a fact.

    "TV Licensing" do not have Police powers. That is also a fact.

    I'm not sure what else there is to say about the Police in this context, but perhaps you will enlighten us?

    If you can't be bothered to read your own posts, why should I help you? But I suspect that if you did and had to admit your are creating nothing more than a logical fallacy and ad hominem arguments. If that is the scope of your debating skills, carry on; be my guest.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • George_Michael
    George_Michael Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Originally Posted by Cornucopiaviewpost.gif
    I'm not sure what else there is to say about the Police in this context, but perhaps you will enlighten us?

    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    If you can't be bothered to read your own posts, why should I help you?

    Here we go again.
    Using the "why should I help you" or "find it on Google" type of argument.
    Don't you ever get bored with this Flyboy?? because many other posters certainly do.
  • pineapple wrote: »
    Why bring police officers into it?

    It is getting a bit OT.

    The facts are, BBC/TVL/Capita have no right of access without a warrant.

    Likewise, you are not obliged to answer any of their questions, allow them to caution you, submit to an interview, or sign a TVL178.

    They have no power of arrest (even if they did, they couldn't use it, because LF evasion is not an arrestable offence) or of seizure, even with a warrant.

    Put simply, you are completely at liberty to ignore them.

    If you tell them to leave, they are obliged, by their own "Standing Orders", to do so.

    You are also free to photograph/video them, at which point they are obliged, by their own "Standing Orders", to leave.

    Nor may they use the threat of a Search warrant, to pressure you into letting them in.

    When you know all this, you realise how powerless they actually are.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.