We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

250k

Looking to invest 250K long term to get the best return!
its for my elderly father

Any ideas?

I understand that the first 12.5K return per year would be tax free
«1345

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    some few details about your father would help

    -how old?
    -property owner?
    -pension or other income?
    -presumably no debts?
    -any depenants (wife?)
  • bcfcctid
    bcfcctid Posts: 6 Forumite
    He is 74 year old homeowner wit a 73 year old wife
    has a pension and no debts

    is that ok?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,390 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I understand that the first 12.5K return per year would be tax free

    Depends on the tax wrappers you use. Which have you identified to use so far and why?

    What is the purpose of the investing and what options have you looked at so far?
    what risk profile are you looking at?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    a 74 year old (wifes age?) could live for another 20 years so it's important to consider the effects of inflation

    at 74 his personal allowance is 10,500 which rises to 10,666 in the tax year he is 75 (assuming his total income - pensions, interest divi are less than 25,400)


    I would suggests the money is devided between investment in S&S and some cash savings dependant upon how much income they need to live on.

    Are they both using their ISA allowances?
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,776 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    (wifes age?)
    73 according to the OP's post 3 above.

    It would be tax efficient to use both parents' tax allowances/ISA allowances.
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pensioners/index.htm

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/tdsi/ten-per-cent-guidance.htm - remember to use current tax bands. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm

    They might want to use both their cash and S&S Isa allowances.
    How much income are they hoping to generate?
    What is their attitude to risk?
  • innovate
    innovate Posts: 16,217 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If the money is available now, split it across banks to ensure there is FSCS protection for all the money. Then take your time to investigate and decide.
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    Retirees of that sort of age usually cannot afford to lose substantial amounts of their capital. In the present climate the risk to capital posed by inflation is substantially lower than the risk posed by the vagaries of the stock market/s and other capital risky investments. I would hesitate to put more than 10%-20% of this money into such investments.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Assuming marbles are still intact, a portfolio of Investment Trusts should generate decent dividend income (no further tax for basic rate tax payers) and they can also sell some of their holdings per year to use CGT allowances for further income and/or to move the money into ISAs.

    There are also purchased life annuities, investment bonds, and other such exotica, but whenever I have looked at these I have taken a dislike to the fees and/or the bad deal for your estate.

    Yes, ITs are "the stock market" but if you're investing long-term and wanting the best return, you won't get that in fixed interest.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • grey_gym_sock
    grey_gym_sock Posts: 4,508 Forumite
    it depends what they're trying to achieve. i.e. what they'd like to spend each year, any other one-off expenditure, and do they care about having money/investments to leave to children (or to anybody).

    if they can generate enough income from ITs, that's a plausible option, and gives their capital some chance of growing for the benefit of whoever they're going to leave it to.

    purchased life annuities might be worth considering if they're struggling to generate enough income. they boost your income, at the price of giving up your capital. however, you can also boost spending by directly spending a little of your capital each year - not too fast, or you could run out of capital, but there is some room to do this safely when you're in your mid-70s.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Retirees of that sort of age usually cannot afford to lose substantial amounts of their capital. In the present climate the risk to capital posed by inflation is substantially lower than the risk posed by the vagaries of the stock market/s and other capital risky investments. I would hesitate to put more than 10%-20% of this money into such investments.
    Then you'd guarantee a very large loss of capital if there's an income need here.

    Investments can be expected to deliver perhaps 4-6% of capital as income, more than that if there's deliberate capital drawdown. Inflation at 3-4% and that's perhaps 10% capital loss a year less interest rate unless investments are used. Perhaps fifteen years until the money has run out at 6% income taking.

    By contrast, now is a relatively good time to be buying equities. Lots of price drops already so the downside/upside risk in many markets is pretty strongly in favour of buying, though gradually to avoid shocks. Less good for high quality corporate or government bonds in Europe, US and Japan though.

    But we still don't know the objectives or risk tolerance here, so much of this is currently moot.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.