We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
MIG taken out now being chased for 'losses'
emmdee57
Posts: 37 Forumite
Hi Guys. I hope someone can advise us. My partner and I purchased a house in 2002 and we had to pay c£3000 for a Mortgage Indemnity Guarantee. I was made bankrupt in 2009 and the property was repossessed in early 2010. My partner is now being chased by solicitors (HL Solicitors of Manchester) asking her to make arrangements to pay the outstanding debt of £4,166 Is this right? My understanding at the time was that MIG was to protect the bank if such an outcome occurred. Please help. She is going out of her mind with worry.
Thank you
Thank you
0
Comments
-
Sadly I believe this is right. As I understand it the MIG protects the bank, but when everything is settled the MIG people can come after you for what they have paid to the bank. My knowledge is limited to the answers of a multiple guess exam, hopefully someone with actual experience of the situation will be along soon to clarifyI am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Google subrigation.
Basically the insurer can pursue you for the money they paid the lender.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Google subrigation.
Basically the insurer can pursue you for the money they paid the lender.
You might do better googling "subrogation":rotfl:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=subrogationI am a mortgage adviser.You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Apologies. Sausage fingers on the keys!I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Sadly I believe this is right. As I understand it the MIG protects the bank, but when everything is settled the MIG people can come after you for what they have paid to the bank. My knowledge is limited to the answers of a multiple guess exam, hopefully someone with actual experience of the situation will be along soon to clarify
Yes, this is my understanding from my CeMAP training too. So sorry OP
0 -
In ignorance I suggest that the OP settle for the difference between the outstanding debt and the original premium. Possibly the effective nature of this insurance has been mis-sold /oversold or misused.
J_B.0 -
Joe_Bloggs wrote: »Possibly the effective nature of this insurance has been mis-sold /oversold or misused.
Not the case. The insurance is for the benefit of the lender. In effect the debt transfers to the insurer. Who can then seek recovery.0 -
Let the lender pay the premium then.
J_B.0 -
Joe_Bloggs wrote: »Let the lender pay the premium then.
J_B.
The MIG would have been a contractual condition of the mortgage offer.0 -
I guess that your liability under MIG would have formed part of your bankrupt estate.
The lender can chase any joint holders of the original debt.
More information from National Debtline on mortgage shortfalls and MIG:
http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=11_mortgage_shortfalls0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards