PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Lost Leasehold Agreement

SecondTimeBuyer
SecondTimeBuyer Posts: 81 Forumite
edited 12 June 2012 at 3:13PM in House buying, renting & selling
Hello, I used to be a registered member but I haven't logged in for a long time.

In 2007 I was a first time buyer (with my brother) and bought a 2 bedroom leasehold maisonette with a share of the freehold. I was sold the maisonette on the basis that it had a 999 year lease from 01.01.1971, that is dated 10/11/2003. I have a letter (and other documents) from my convayencing solictor confirming these dates. I also have a copy of the Land Registry "Official Copy of Registered Entries" that confirms there was a lease renewal in 2003. We have a mortgage with NatWest.

Moving forward 5 years my brother and I are in the process of selling the leasehold flat. We instructed our solicitors (who were the conveyencing solicitors for the purchase) to sell the property to a BTL investor. During the usual searches the solicitor has informed my by phone call that the Land Registry has lost my 'current' lease and they only have a copy of the lease dated 1971 that only lasts for 99 years (54 year remaining) not the 999 years stated when I bought the property.

Within my documents I have the lease dated 1971 for 99 years, but I have no copies of the lease dated 2003 that is 999 years from 1971.

My girlfiend and I have now found a place we would like to purchase but the vendor will not accept our offer until we have exchanged contracts with the person buying our property. Therefore we are at risk of losing it. Please can someone here help me with where I stand, and how I can move forward quickly?

Thanks in advance!
«13

Comments

  • Sorry there were some facts I missed off. The Mangagement Company and Directors that look after the block that I live do not have a copy either of the lease agreements and I have run out of ideas on how to trace a copy of the old lease!
  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,841 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Have you contacted these people for advice in this situation? http://www.lease-advice.org/?
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
  • Thanks. I have sent them an e-enquiry and will call them if I have not heard back within the next couple of days.

    Are there any other known avenues of obtaining a duplicate of the lease from 2003?
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Ask your solicitor who acted on the sale, and for the landlord at the time, and your mortgagee
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Ask your solicitor who acted on the sale, and for the landlord at the time, and your mortgagee

    Thanks for the response. Sorry I was probably not clear, I am using the same solicitor for the sale of the property and for the initial purchase and they raised the issue 3/4 weeks ago about the current lease being missing.

    The 'landlord' is the collection of leaseholders, I have spoken to the Directors of the block and the Management Company - neither have a copy of any leases for the block (I can't believe how disorganised they are :mad:)

    I have contacted NatWest (our mortgagee) and they have sent me duplicates of all the documents they hold and unfortunately they are for the 99 year lease, not the current 999 year lease.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    But surely a firm of solicitors acted for the landlord to issue the lease extensions or a new lease....

    Then I suggest that you arrange with the landlord's to have a lease executed to replace it ( a simple surrender and grant), and I hope that all the leases are on the same terms to make it simple.

    Do you have any insurance polices that cover loss of "deeds" or other legal expenses
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • But surely a firm of solicitors acted for the landlord to issue the lease extensions or a new lease....

    Then I suggest that you arrange with the landlord's to have a lease executed to replace it ( a simple surrender and grant), and I hope that all the leases are on the same terms to make it simple.

    Do you have any insurance polices that cover loss of "deeds" or other legal expenses

    Thanks, The Managment Company changed in 2007 just after I bought the place. I will chase the old Management Company down and see what I can find from them.

    Thanks for all the advice!
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Thanks, The Managment Company changed in 2007 just after I bought the place. I will chase the old Management Company down and see what I can find from them.

    Thanks for all the advice!

    But your solicitor will have corresponded with the landlords solicitors -they know who they are :D.....

    Very welcome

    They will find out out far more readily than an old agent who will be reluctant to pay for archive files on a five year old instruction.

    As it happened in 2003 they likely will not have kept the files after 7 years ( 6 plus 1 just in case).
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Richard_Webster
    Richard_Webster Posts: 7,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If you have official copies of a title register showing a 999 year lease then the Land Registry have some explaining to do as to where that lease has gone. Get those copies out and track down that title number.

    In order to register the new lease in the first place they must have had the original and a spare copy out of which they could create an official copy. What seems to have happened is that loads of documents were sent by the Land Registry to an outside company for scanning in when everything went electronic and a few got lost. If that's the case here then you may be entitled to compensation from the Land Registry.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    I was valuing the freeholds of a client's two blocks with a complicated history of title and visited HMLR and they recalled the file from Portsmouth.

    Low and behold there was huge section, outlined in red by HMLR !, about contributions to the shared drive and parking areas which was supposed to be in the register, but which was never done.

    It had been filed away with the old titles of two of the (several) old houses that were demolished to make up the north end of the site but which had been merged into one title.

    I suggest as RW' suggests, they are probably mis-marked, hopefully in the file.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.6K Life & Family
  • 256.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.