We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Car insurance inspection and claim

Had an accident with no visible damage to both vehicles. Third party made claim for damage after inspection through unknown garage. I requested my insurance company to inspect the vehicle before making any payments for vehicle repair. They assured no payments would be made without an inspection.

A few months later found out vehicle had already been repaired without being inspected by my insurance company and affecting my NCD.

Am i allowed to seek compensation from my insurance company for failing to inspect as I requested?

Comments

  • cinereus
    cinereus Posts: 2,707 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    That's shocking!
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    london3 wrote: »
    Am i allowed to seek compensation from my insurance company for failing to inspect as I requested?

    You can seek it, but don't expect to get any.

    You agree in the ts + cs to let them deal with claims as they think fit.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    whilst as quentin say they can deal with claims to minimise the cost to them (which might sometimes not minimise the cost to you) I'd say this only applies to claims they are required by law to pay (under RTA) or claims you ask them to deal with.

    If you instructed them not to pay without inspection (presumably because you thought the claim was fraudulent) then I'd say that for them to pay without investigation or at least discussing it with you is unfair and worthy of a complaint.

    Are you claiming that you've suffered financially as a result of their behaviour?
  • vaio wrote: »
    Are you claiming that you've suffered financially as a result of their behaviour?

    Thanks for your responses.

    This was over a year ago and since then I've changed my insurance company. I have suffered financially because my premium has significantly gone up. I'm making a complaint now because I feel they should have verified the damage to the vehicle as I expected and from what I was told.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    london3 wrote: »
    Had an accident with no visible damage to both vehicles. Third party made claim for damage after inspection through unknown garage. I requested my insurance company to inspect the vehicle before making any payments for vehicle repair. They assured no payments would be made without an inspection.

    A few months later found out vehicle had already been repaired without being inspected by my insurance company and affecting my NCD.

    Am i allowed to seek compensation from my insurance company for failing to inspect as I requested?

    From the post, I asume it's your fault, as you asked your insurers to inspect before paying. It's an academic exercise in that case. Your insurer would pay to assess the claim, and whether or not they agree to any damage, your ncd would be docked to pay the assessor. At best your would declare a fault accident -zero payout, but that appears to affect your premium about as much as a fault claim, say £2000 payout. You still lose the same amount of ncd.
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I thought about that too, but I don't think that the costs of my insurance company investigating and rejecting a fraudulent claim made against me should attach to my record.

    Certainly the "incident" would be on my record but the costs of adminstering the claim are overheads and not recoverable or added to the costs registered against my record and I'd say this applies to investigation of fraudulent claims too, it's an overhead and should be spread across all policy holders rather than allocated to individuals
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    vaio wrote: »
    I thought about that too, but I don't think that the costs of my insurance company investigating and rejecting a fraudulent claim made against me should attach to my record.

    Certainly the "incident" would be on my record but the costs of adminstering the claim are overheads and not recoverable or added to the costs registered against my record and I'd say this applies to investigation of fraudulent claims too, it's an overhead and should be spread across all policy holders rather than allocated to individuals

    I didn't read it at the op denying the claim, just that there wasn't enough damage to justify any repair. So either way, it would need to be assessed. So the op's insurer has a cost, they have to pay someone to decide if any repair work should be undertaken.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.