We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Selling Problems - please help
spluff
Posts: 186 Forumite
The flat I am in is on the way to being sold and we have just been told by our solicitor that there are 2 queries that have been raised.
1. Environmental issue - failed to give a certificate. Cant understand why this is the case and what the cause is. No-one else in the apartment block has had problems when selling their property and we were not told of any issues when we bought it. Is this a major problem? Our solicitor has asked their solicitor to contact the local authority.
2. Lease is defective. The original lease that was entered into by the first time owners is "claimed" to be defective because it does not have an "enforcable convenants provision". Anyone have any idea what this is? What it means? And how it is resolved? Again no-one selling their property has had this problem either.
Worried......
SpLuFF.
1. Environmental issue - failed to give a certificate. Cant understand why this is the case and what the cause is. No-one else in the apartment block has had problems when selling their property and we were not told of any issues when we bought it. Is this a major problem? Our solicitor has asked their solicitor to contact the local authority.
2. Lease is defective. The original lease that was entered into by the first time owners is "claimed" to be defective because it does not have an "enforcable convenants provision". Anyone have any idea what this is? What it means? And how it is resolved? Again no-one selling their property has had this problem either.
Worried......
SpLuFF.
0
Comments
-
the Env search isnt a biggie, if the flats are fairly new all this would have been taken care of at the planning stage.
The secondary issue about the lease I suspect is more of an issue. I guess that what they are saying is, if people defect on the lease ( eg having pets, or other things that are being forbiden) theres nothing in place to deal with the repercussions. It could be that there is a standard annexe to lease, and the freeholder has it. it could be theres no provision in place.
I am NOT an expert, but Im guessing thats what this means.:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
thanks for your reply...... the build is quite new (around 8 years now).
So basically i just dont do anything and let the other solicitor contact the local authority about the env issue and the lease?
I just feel helpless at the moment and would love to know when i can start planning0 -
the lease is to do with the freeholder
Is the freeholder ther council ( did you buy off the council or an ex council place?) if not its the freeholder who can be the builder , or someone else/.:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
it was built by a developer. So i guess their solicitor will need to chase the builder. fun fun fun.
I think its just being really picky as I said no-one else has had any problems at all.0 -
You are paying your solicitor to act for you so he should give you a better explanation of the nature of the defect in the lease. Press him for this.
As a conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful but I accept no liability except to fee-paying clients
RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
the defect is that we do not have enforcable convenants provison.
Well thats what i was told. Dont know if this makes a lease invalid or not.0 -
Whilst I can guess at what that could mean it is really for your solicitor to explain in layman's terms to you what the background to it is. Also there are lots of possible scenarios so if you give more detail we may be able to work out what it is.
Are each of you basically responsible for looking after your own flat and keeping it in good condition or does the Landlord or someone else look after the structure and common areas? Is there a management company/residents association kind of set up for looking after these matters? Are you members of this? What is it called?
As far as the env search is concerned people don't laways do them so when you bought the point possibly didn't come up. Also one Env sch company can fail/refer for further action a property where another company would "Pass" it. Of it is only 8 years old the chances are that the Council imposed a planning condition requiring an expert report as to what should be done to deal with any contamination and then further confirmation from the experts that it was actually dealt with.
As a conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful but I accept no liability except to fee-paying clients
RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards