10,000 tenants behind with their rents

homelessskilledworker

chucky wrote: »

10,000 people? In 2005 12% of property was privately rented and about 18% was social rented. In 2012 it's going to be higher now.

So... If we just take these 10,000 as being a combination of social and private tenants that's a massive 0.23% of tenants.

But as most journalists aren't usually clear and go for the headline number instead of the real info that's a huge 0.34% of tenants. Both percentages will be lower if we used today's numbers.

I'm surprised that homelesskilled worker didn't use the 0.23% or the 0.34% number to make the point or use it in his subject line of the thread... but then again

I am not making any point, I just posted the article.

Please have at least one attempt at posting without your emotive bit*hing

chucky

homelessskilledworker wrote: »

I am not making any point, I just posted the article.

Quite, I've noticed that about you.

homelessskilledworker wrote: »

Please have at least one attempt at posting without your emotive bit*hing

So trying to discuss the number of tenants asking contacting the Consumer Credit Councelling Service is emotive bit*hing now.

It sounds more like you don't have a constructive intelligent reply to my post. Thanks for confirming that by the way.

homelessskilledworker

chucky wrote: »

Quite, I've noticed that about you.

So trying to discuss the number of tenants asking contacting the Consumer Credit Councelling Service is emotive bit*hing now.

It sounds more like you don't have a constructive intelligent reply to my post. Thanks for confirming that by the way.

Looks like you have me bang to rights as well:silenced::silenced::silenced:

Great how you put all us bears in our place

chucky

homelessskilledworker wrote: »

Looks like you have me bang to rights as well:silenced::silenced::silenced:

Not really, just bringing more information to the thread. Apologies for doing that.

homelessskilledworker wrote: »

Great how you put all us bears in our place

Bears/Bulls, never met one of these characters in the real world. Must be a fantasy thing.

homelessskilledworker

chucky wrote: »

Not really, just bringing more information to the thread. Apologies for doing that.

Bears/Bulls, never met one of these characters in the real world. Must be a fantasy thing.

I accept your apologys, but you really don't have to, I quite like your posts, can't understand why everyone else thinks you talk bollox:)

Percy1983

Are people missing the point here, who cares which 0.1% of a percentage it is, we have people living in such poor conditions and this is cheered on by yet more landlords raising prices.

Regulation in the form of rent caps is needed.

chucky

Percy1983 wrote: »

Are people missing the point here, who cares which 0.1% of a percentage it is, we have people living in such poor conditions and this is cheered on by yet more landlords raising.

Where is the cheering, are you making that up?

chucky

homelessskilledworker wrote: »

I quite like your posts

That's very nice of you.

The_J

Percy1983 wrote: »

Are people missing the point here, who cares which 0.1% of a percentage it is, we have people living in such poor conditions and this is cheered on by yet more landlords raising prices.

Regulation in the form of rent caps is needed.

Next week Zimbabwe holds their annual sport relief to help out poor englishmen in their hovels.

"Jack is a poor little white boy" (dramatic pause)
"This year, Jack will only play 4 xbox games and will only get one new phone"
"Jack is also sad that he never knew his father, his mother has to stay at home, cook for him, take him to see his friends, fetch him coke from the fridge and she only gets paid £2,000 by the Government for doing so"
"Jack is not well, his grades are suffering because he has to get the bus to school"
"Please give to help Jack"

RenovationMan

Is that 10,000 brand new contacts or do some people ring a few times over that 12 month period, racking up the figures?