We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Seller will not split cost.

Our survey came through with only minor issues. One of them does require immediate action and we have been quoted £400. The vendor does not want to split cost.

We can afford to pay this sum, but is that the norm or can anyone suggest how this can be negotiated further? We did offer a few days after the house came into the market.

Comments

  • courtjester
    courtjester Posts: 758 Forumite
    Probably depends on whether you view this to be a deal breaker or not - it's not a large sum and most would probably think it not worth arguing over. Possibly the asking price and /or your accepted (lower) offer already reflects the lack of perfection in the property?

    There's nothing wrong with asking for a contribution, but if the vendor says no, you then have to decide if this is sufficiently important for you to lose the purchase over.

    Is there something else that you could bargain for? Say having something included in the sale that currently isn't, or setting a specific early date for exchange /completion - it's all perfectly acceptable haggling, but don't get bogged down over minor things as you could just irritate the vendor enough to sell to someone else instead.
  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,844 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry, but if a buyer came to me about a minor issue that cost just £400 to put right & wanted me to share the cost with them I'd be pretty peed off.

    No house comes without at least some problems or issues & £400 is peanuts. I'd never dream of expecting a vendor to put his hand in his pocket for a minor issue.

    Thank your lucky stars the house has no real problem. You say you can afford to pay for the work, so why not just do so. I don't mean to sound harsh, but to me splitting the cost of work only comes into play when there is a serious & more costly issue with a property.
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.