We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Was I entitled to more when my father died without a will?

Hi
My father died 11 years ago without a will. He was married to my stepmother at the time but they weren't living together.
She ended up with everything. She did give myself and my brother 100k each of the 800k life insurance policy. This was always my dads wishes to give us both 100k of his money when we were both 30 whether he was a alive or dead.
At the time I was 21 and grieving my father and in no way did I look into any entitlement I would have as my father daughter to his estate. Its only now I wonder if I would have had more entitlement.
Im not being greedy it just riles me that my awful stepmother ended up with the lot (she has only after all these years got round to putting a gravestone on his grave)....
She still lives in the massive house (on her own) that she shared with my father and I wonder too if I would have any claim to the house if she dies or sells?
If anyone can give me any answers or clues to the complex world of probate law and if there is anything in this worth pursuing I would be very grateful.
thanks
A

Comments

  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • Newly_retired
    Newly_retired Posts: 3,320 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 May 2012 at 3:25PM
    As they were married she is his heir. If you were dependant on him at the time of his death you would have had more of a claim. But it seems you were 21 and possibly working by then?
    It does depend how much the estate was worth though.
    Excellent article from Advice Guide - see above.
    At least you got £100K. If you weren't a dependant that may have been more than your step-mother was legally obliged to do. At least she honoured his wishes there.
    If his estate was larger than the amount stated in the article, seek legal advice.
    Your father should have made a will and made greater provision for his children but sadly he didn't.
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,616 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A lot depends whether the house was held as joint tenants or tenants in common.

    If it was a joint tenancy, then as the sole survivor becomes the sole tenant and the house is not included in the estate at all.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • YesWillMan
    YesWillMan Posts: 83 Forumite
    edited 30 May 2012 at 1:10PM
    In 2001 (i.e. eleven years ago) if a person with children died without leaving a will
    the surviving husband or wife shall take the personal chattels absolutely and, in addition the first £125,000 of the residuary estate of the intestate (other than the personal chattels) subject to providing for that sum and the interest thereon, the residuary estate (other than the personal chattels) shall be held—
    (a) as to one half upon trust for the surviving husband or wife during his or her life, and, subject to such life interest, on the statutory trusts for the issue of the intestate, and
    (b) as to the other half, on the statutory trusts for the issue of the intestate
    Statutory trusts just means the issue getting monies at the age of eighteen.

    So the £800,000 plus any other assets would form part of your father's estate together with a share of the property if your father owned part of the property as Tenants in common. If it was jointly owned then his share would pass to your stepmother.
    So excluding the house and bank accounts that would mean the 800,000 less 125,000 would be 675,000 giving 337,500 in life interest for the Stepmother and 337,500 in Statutory trusts for you and your brother which meaning that being over 18 means that you should of had this at least not just 100,000 each.

    This is laid down by law so there is no argument that Stepmother can put forward and you and your brother have valid claims. See a STEP Solicitor if I was you.

    PS Just to clarify the other £375,000 goes between the 2 of you on Stepmothers death.
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,574 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The life insurance sometimes passes directly to a named person and isn't counted as part of the estate. If the house was also owned as joint tenants, the estate could have been very small.
  • mvteng
    mvteng Posts: 514 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    If your father live in Scotland you certainly have rights.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.