We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Guardian bear Patrick Collinson - Pensions? BTL is perhaps the way to go
Comments
-
grizzly1911 wrote: »What sort of wage would amass that size of pot of the "current" 40 years?
i expect most people could accrue a pension pot of £50k (adjusted for inflation) over 40 years. you wouldn't need to pay huge amounts in. the trouble is that most people don't contribute to a pension for 40 years, and don't start until they are in their mid 30s if i recall correctly.grizzly1911 wrote: »Offset to this is the more tax that will be paid as more of any pension becomes immediately taxable and the fact that council tax and housing benefit may double that base pension figure. I know that housing benefit of c.£6K is paid to a couple under present arrangements in a non affluent area of the country and council tax would be an additional c.£1200 pa.
Still better to earn £40pw extra than someone on basic state pension and be taxed at 20% than to earn £0pw and be taxed at 0%. (And if you take the income at the time instead of putting it into the pension you would have been taxed when you earned it anyway).
However, if you were to lose £40pw of housing benefit and then also be taxed on the £40pw of pension, that would be a pretty crappy outcome.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »I suspect changes are planned. As this would appear to be the first steps in simplifying an administratively expensive bureaucratic system. With the net result of huge cost savings.
The logic I was using was that if everyone is on a flat state pension then either everyone is below a threshold and so everyone is entitled to pensions credit style benefits, or no one is below a threshold and so no one is entitled to pensions credit style benefits.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »i expect most people could accrue a pension pot of £50k (adjusted for inflation) over 40 years. you wouldn't need to pay huge amounts in. the trouble is that most people don't contribute to a pension for 40 years, and don't start until they are in their mid 30s if i recall correctly.
...
Can we predict job security for someone new to the labour market over the next 40 years?
I've seen massive changes to the sectors I have worked in over a period of a decade, never mind 4 times that duration.
Perhaps we should plan for greater disruption in our future working lives, and ensure our long term savings vehicles are more flexible.0 -
-
undetterred wrote: »Is it D 1ck
Is your full name "can't spell undeterred because I'm a thick w@nker"?0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
