We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Quick Survey........
Comments
-
It's your policy and therefore your responsibility to make sure it is correct... everyone knows comparison sites are sparse with the information they pass over and that is why you are told when you go to the direct insurers website to check the information before submitting a legally binding contract based on the information that has been provided to them. The fact the OP is aware his ban was not included yet fails to still disclose a material fact in the hope he can get a claim paid out is imo wrong... Would the insurers of provided cover in the first place had they known about the ban, probably not?
Most insurers tend to have wording like this on their sites...
Indeed they do, that's why the FSA had to remind them it'd not down to the customer to ensure the software works correctly, it's down to the comparison site to get it right, which wa the whole point of the FSA's warning to them. They don't get out of the responsibility merely by writing a few words trying to shift it onrto the customer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards