We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenant accidentally damaged property - who pays?
Options
Comments
-
Lavatory was/wasn't working fine for the period leading up this blockage?
If not, had tenant reported to the landlord?
If working fine, how long was this period of working fine?
Blockage was caused by who?
Landlord was/wasn't informed of blockage prior to any attempt to clear?
Attempt to clear blockage was done by who?
Damage to pipe at rear of lavatory was done by who?
On the basis of the answers, which appear from your first post to be fairly clear, it is clear where financial responsibility for this repair lies.
Arrange the repairs asap (to get a working lavatory back), but make clear the bill will be forwarded to them. Ideally start wih a friendly face-to-face/telephone chat where you can explain the reasoning etc, but follow up with a letter.0 -
BitterAndTwisted wrote: »Going by a circuitous route to the down-pipe does not automatically mean that it was badly fitted in the first place. Presumably it had been completely adequate for some time before the tenants managed to block it and then break it.
a circuitous route?
the installation should be made up of sewer pipe (held securely in place) to the point it can be joined to the wc with a pan connector.
Getting something round the u-bend strong enough to cause the pipe to move is odd . . .0 -
Toilets have U-Bends, so a plunger won't cause this unless the pipe was poorly fitted. If they mis-used draining rods, there may be a case, but if they tried to plunge and the pressure was enough for the pipe to disconnect, I'd say it was poorly fitted in the first place (and so a compromised cost)0
-
Hi everyone, thanks for your advise, it is all greatly appreciated!
Here's an update: I got it repaired straight away and spoke to the management agent about it. The tenants are arguing that the pipe was badly fitted to begin with. I'm arguing that it's been fine for 5 years since the bathroom was fitted, so...
I guess i'd be happy to split the bill 50/500 -
Hi everyone, thanks for your advise, it is all greatly appreciated!
Here's an update: I got it repaired straight away and spoke to the management agent about it. The tenants are arguing that the pipe was badly fitted to begin with. I'm arguing that it's been fine for 5 years since the bathroom was fitted, so...
I guess i'd be happy to split the bill 50/50
You should ask the plumber for a short report on whether the pipe was defective in any way.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards