We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Facebook worth $104BN?
Comments
- 
            Tanking so far today, currently down over 13%.There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...0
- 
            worldtraveller wrote: »Tanking so far today, currently down over 13%.
 DOH should have shorted at the weekend.
 I'll bet the price is on a downward slope from here.0
- 
            All very silly, really.FACT.0
- 
            The selloff in Facebook's shares deepened on Tuesday, as investors continued to question the stock's valuation after Reuters reported that underwriters cut their revenue forecasts for the company before the IPO.
 The company surprised investors after disclosing, just days before the initial public offering, that its revenue may be hit by more users transitioning to mobile platforms, where advertising is less proven. That prompted the analyst at Morgan Stanley to surprisingly tell clients that he was cutting his revenue forecasts for the company.
 Reuters
 It appears that this material information was allegedly only passed on to selective institutional clients. This could be a problem due to laws regarding selective dissemination.There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...0
- 
            I'm trying to see whats happended here... was facebook 'misvalued' to start with, and do investors have any comeback on this or is it you pays your money and takes your chances?0
- 
            I'm trying to see whats happended here... was facebook 'misvalued' to start with, and do investors have any comeback on this or is it you pays your money and takes your chances?
 Basically it's caveat emptor (buyer beware) unless the sellers have material information that would make you think the company is worth less and they withhold it from you.
 It's the same as buying a house basically.0
- 
            Just read this: http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-heres-the-inside-story-of-what-happened-on-the-facebook-ipo-2012-5 which is pretty disgusting if true.
 (The gist for those who can't be bothered to read is that half way through the road shows, the underwriters became aware that FB was not going to meet its earnings & revenue targets but only told institutional investors rather than all investors. This is potentially a violation of SEC regulations and maybe investigated).0
- 
            Just read this: http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-heres-the-inside-story-of-what-happened-on-the-facebook-ipo-2012-5 which is pretty disgusting if true.
 (The gist for those who can't be bothered to read is that half way through the road shows, the underwriters became aware that FB was not going to meet its earnings & revenue targets but only told institutional investors rather than all investors. This is potentially a violation of SEC regulations and maybe investigated).
 I read it and it sounds like Rumour-Mongering at its finest to me.
 I told you this was a screaming short though.0
- 
            Great. So now we don't just have insider trading, but insider not trading. I wonder if any of the shorting can be traced back to the firms (or their employees) with insider knowledge.Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
 0
- 
            UNfortunately gen, as I understand it. The share isnt shortable at the mo.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
         

 
          
         