We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
71% of income on rent in London
Comments
-
PasturesNew wrote: »The article said that singles fared worst, with high rents on small flats.
Yup, singles fair worst as in worse than couples or families, but that's only indirectly linked to whether or not the poorest are paying disproportionately more (singles probably being disproportionately the young or very old.)Saving for deposit: Finished! :j
House buying: Finished!
Next task: Lots and lots of DIY0 -
FindAProperty is a website for estate agents to advertise houses - like Rightmove. It's owned BY estate agents FOR estate agents.... but has never had the appeal/reach that Rightmove has had ... and that p155e5 them off. Their leads are lower quality than the leads from RM too. They are sitting on a stack of data from their website - so this piece is really just badly wrriten Press Release junk to raise their profile, rather than intelligent research based on a true full data set.I'm with you on that. The same story's been covered by a lot of sources, but none of the articles are any good. None of the broadsheets have covered it so far.0 -
Pretty sure you're right there Pasturesnew - about it being to raise their profile as well as their site being a bit !!!!!. I'd still be really interested to find out what research they did do.Saving for deposit: Finished! :j
House buying: Finished!
Next task: Lots and lots of DIY0 -
And those of us who don't have them get fed up with the constant ... "what if a small child...." being brought into everything.Graham_Devon wrote: »
I bought kids into it, as lots of people have them.
0 -
Probably a simple SQL query across the month's downloaded rental adverts..... SELECT RENTAMT FROM RENTALS WHERE Active=YES.Pretty sure you're right there Pasturesnew - about it being to raise their profile as well as their site being a bit !!!!!. I'd still be really interested to find out what research they did do.
Then grabbed the "average wages" off some Govt website.
And then got a pen out and gave the figures to a meeja studies stoodent on werk expeerientz.0 -
The article is a complete load of toss. Most sources say average rent in London is in the region of about £1,000 per month. This article suggests that people earning £35k are paying £25k in rent. They are not.
Try going into a letting agent and renting a property for £2k a month when you earn £3k a month gross. It doesn't work, they expect gross salary to be 2.5x the rent.
1) the average rent for a London property is not £25k
2) the article ignores that most households will have 2 incomes
3) the article ignores the massive amount of house sharing
They may be grossing up the rent to reflect what per tax earning you need to pay it, but if so they should be clearer.0 -
Just wanted to throw this article out there for debate.
http://money.aol.co.uk/2012/05/08/staggering-rents-swallow-38-of-income
The key bit (to me) is 'Meanwhile things in London are even more bleak, where rent takes up around 71% of income on average and adds up to £25,824 a year.'
If true, I find that absolutely shocking. I knew that 50%-60% of income going on rent wasn't unusual, but 71%!
Is it sustainable?
Totally agree! Apart from the social and personal problems this causes, it also has a serious impact on the economy.
There is no shortage of evidence to show that economic growth gravitates towards stable, well run low tax economies. High rents are the equivalent of a surtax on employment. Countries that don't keep a check on housing costs must inevitably suffer the consequences.0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »And those of us who don't have them get fed up with the constant ... "what if a small child...." being brought into everything.

Oops, well, sorry
0 -
Just shows that there's lots of scope for large rent rises in the other UK regions. If Londoners can tolerate rent at 70% of single income, so can tenants elsewhere.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
Turnbull2000 wrote: »Just shows that there's lots of scope for large rent rises in the other UK regions. If Londoners can tolerate rent at 70% of single income, so can tenants elsewhere.
And I bet the nation of renters would be well chuffed with that. _party_0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards