We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Legal sale or not

renovation_man
Posts: 78 Forumite
My son and his girlfriend are in the process of buying a property on the first phase of a private development, the first phase is incomplete and the developer has an illness and has gone into liquidation.
Another developer was supposed to take over the 2nd phase but would have to adopt the unfinished works etc of the 1st phase.
They have paid in my opinion extortionate fee's to their surveyors, solicitors etc as they have to rent their existing house and raise some money on it for a deposit, they have signed a contract been given a a date of moving in as the 19th May, however it now seems that the developer has not signed his contract to adopt the 2nd phase and their moving date has been delayed.
Could somebody advise if they had the legal right to sell this house in the first place as it is not completed and they would have sold it on the presumption that the developer would sign.
In my opinion the estate agent or receiver should not market the houses until all procedures are in place, they are not the only ones in this situation so would like to try and help get their money back without the expense of other solicitors.
I would appreciate any advice
Another developer was supposed to take over the 2nd phase but would have to adopt the unfinished works etc of the 1st phase.
They have paid in my opinion extortionate fee's to their surveyors, solicitors etc as they have to rent their existing house and raise some money on it for a deposit, they have signed a contract been given a a date of moving in as the 19th May, however it now seems that the developer has not signed his contract to adopt the 2nd phase and their moving date has been delayed.
Could somebody advise if they had the legal right to sell this house in the first place as it is not completed and they would have sold it on the presumption that the developer would sign.
In my opinion the estate agent or receiver should not market the houses until all procedures are in place, they are not the only ones in this situation so would like to try and help get their money back without the expense of other solicitors.
I would appreciate any advice
0
Comments
-
Two things are unclear to me from your post:
1) has the 'new' developer actually taken over the liabilities of the original developer? If not yet, then they have no right to sell the properties.
2) has your son acually got a contract exchanged with the original (or indeed the new) developer? 'Signing' the contract does not mean the contract exists, unless the developer also signed, and the contracts were exchanged.
Is your son using a solicitor? (You mention solicitors costs). If so, he should be advising!0 -
Thanks for your reply, the developer has not signed to undertake the other liabilities, the solicitor was appointed by the estate agent I believe. I have not asked for many details as they like to be independent but think it's time to try and help. I shall ask for more information tomorrow and post on the subject again.0
-
paying a deposit =/= contracts being exchanged.
Why has he paid for a survey on a new build qthat isn't even finished yet? I suspect he only has a solicitors bill.
Also I'd just be buying somewhere else. This all sounds very painful. I'd ask the recivers for my deposit back or if it were under a grand think it well worth it to not hae to deal ith the position.Debt free 4th April 2007.
New house. Bigger mortgage. MFWB after I have my buffer cash in place.0 -
My concern would be if the development doesn't get finished / gets sold off cheaper - what would happen to the value of your sons house then?0
-
And as an aside, advise your son NEVER to use the estate agent recommended solicitor.
* the EA works for the seller/developer - not your son, so is biased
* the solicitor will be paying the EA an intro commission for the business
* the solicitor's firm may even be the same firm acting for the seller/developer - legal (just) if done right, but clearly a risk of conflict of interest.
always find/instruct your own completely independant solicitors.0 -
Since when did EAs start 'appointing' solicitors to act on behalf of buyers??"You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0
-
I think its going to be a bit complicated, the EA was appointed by the receivers I think. There is a meeting with the new developer later in the week.0
-
Is this a mess, I have spoken to the developer and he said he has signed a contract with the receivers and they have given him a year to complete.
They have had a mortgage offer but they want an indemnity policy in place before they proceed with the sale, but who does it come from. The developer says it's nothing to do with him as he hasn't paid for it yet. They have went to a financial adviser who has obvioulsy given them bad advice, he recommended the solicitors which are in Sussex instead of local companies and I believe thay should not have started any searches, valuations, surveys etc until they were sure that sale could be completed.
There's loads of work to do on this, I think the first step would be the financial adviser and ask him his reasons.
They have changed their sons school, they have rented their house and the tenant was supposed to be moving in next week, they in turn have given notice to their landlord.
They stand to lose a couple of grand at least, maybe legal advice and try to claim from the adviser???0 -
I still don't understand, has your son actually exchanged contracts? If not just walk away, move into rented and start looking again. If they have, how, if the developer is unable to complete? Even, if your son does complete then they could be entering the nightmare situation of living on incomplete building site for the next 10 years.
Your son's solicitor needs to be earning their fees and advising you what to do.
I also don't understand what you plan to sue the IFA for - they advise on mortgages, on the basis your son doesn't have one yet, I'd love to know on what grounds you plan to take action.0 -
Who mentioned the word sue? IMHO the FA should have advised them not to start searches, valuations etc until they were positive they could complete.
He advised them to use solicitors 250 miles away who's charges are 3 times higher than the local solicitors.
He introduced them to mortgage arrangers who are charging them nearly £2000 to arrange a mortgage to raise money on their existing home to get a deposit.
And no doubt he is getting a nice little earner out of as well.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards