We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

selling to a developer/sitting tennants

Hi i own a village shop with accomodation above. the lease runs out end of 2014 and i want to sell to developers as tennants cannot afford to buy but want to renegotiate lease. what problems will i have getting them to move out. thanks
«13

Comments

  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    Why do you want to get them out, that's the deveoper's problem not yours? Lots of developers are happy for there to be tenants in place as it gives them an income as they work the planning permission.

    If they have a lease that does not expire until 2014 and there is not a break clause between now and then, then as long as they continue paying rent you can't get them out. You would need to come to a mutually beneficial agreement for them to rip up the lease, ie pay them to leave.
  • colinjc
    colinjc Posts: 7 Forumite
    if i cant get them out how will the developers ? wouldnt they offer lower price with tennants in situ? should i get planning permisson first or leave that to the developers?
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    Is it your tenants lease that runs out in 2014?

    I personally wouldnt be even thinking about this for another year. They have the security for a long time, you cannot make them move out until then.

    Seems to be a 'cross that bridged when you come to it' type of thing. You dont know who you are selling to yet surely? Different developers will wants different things I would have thought?
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    colinjc wrote: »
    if i cant get them out how will the developers ? wouldnt they offer lower price with tennants in situ? should i get planning permisson first or leave that to the developers?

    They would pay them to leave. Short Term tenants such as this would have little impact on the value to a developer. However, they might be happy for them to stay until the developer is ready to develop the plot which may well be after 2014.

    If you want better advice you really need to explain what the situation is:
    Have you been approached by developers?
    Have they told you they need the property empty before they buy it?
    What do you think it can be developed into?
    How much income does it currently produce?
    How much have they offered you?
  • colinjc
    colinjc Posts: 7 Forumite
    not been approached by developers. thought about approaching them first. its a corner plot could be turned into 3 or 4 flats or large 4/5 bed house i would think, but not spoken to anyone about that yet. income 16k.pa
    had premises valued 2006 at 275k with tennants 375k without
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    Well if you are wanting them out sooner rather than later, I would expect you to be offering a chunk of change to get them out, considering you will be 100k better off, according to yourself...
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    If you want to sell it, just put it on the market and if there are developers interested they will find you. If you want to add value then get the planning permission yourself and sell it with the benefit of the consent, although there will be upfront costs.

    If I were you I'd find a good local firm of Chartered Surveyors (who buy and sell commercial property) and get them to give you some marketing advice. It's unlikely they'll charge you for a marketing report and they'll tell you what it's worth now and what it may be worth with planning consent, you can then decide how to move forward.

    I really wouldn't go off approaching developers yourself, you'll just get fleeced. That's how developers make money, they pay as little as possible and if you don't know exactly what your property is worth now and once developed you're in no position to negotiate.

    On average, commercial property prices fell 45% between 2007 and 2010. So basing any kind of decision on a value from 2006 will make life quite difficult for you. You need up-to-date advice.
  • Benji
    Benji Posts: 640 Forumite
    That length of tenancy is 'unusual' and makes me wonder if this is a 'bog standard' AST or not.

    When did the tenats move in? If it was between 15 January 1989 and 27th February 1997 was a 'section 20' notice served before commencement of the tenancy?
    Life should be a little nuts; otherwise it's just a bunch of Thursdays strung together.
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    Benji wrote: »
    That length of tenancy is 'unusual' and makes me wonder if this is a 'bog standard' AST or not.

    When did the tenats move in? If it was between 15 January 1989 and 27th February 1997 was a 'section 20' notice served before commencement of the tenancy?

    It's a commercial property and therefore none of the above applies.
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    JQ. wrote: »
    It's a commercial property and therefore none of the above applies.

    Even if the flat above is self contained and let out as accomodation?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.