We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Savers' compensation hope after Santander bond defeat

2»

Comments

  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Jarlawuk wrote: »
    Santander's 2.75% bond is an open ended access bond which is used when clients who don't provide instructions on what they want to do with their bond.
    In this instance it is clear that the staff member did not know what they were talking about and failed to deal with the issue properly.
    If that's the case, I don't understand why Santander didn't release the funds for transfer when the complaint was made instead of forcing the customer to go to the Ombudsman.
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  • Jarlawuk
    Jarlawuk Posts: 555 Forumite
    edited 10 May 2012 at 1:56PM
    If that's the case, I don't understand why Santander didn't release the funds for transfer when the complaint was made instead of forcing the customer to go to the Ombudsman.

    I don't understand how it would get that far either personally. I mean just going by any banks standard complaints procedure, all efforts would be made to resolve the issue prior to it getting to the ombudsman, due the cost of the ombudsman being involved.

    Especially in this case where it involves a Reward Bond and the funds are accessible at anytime. Even if the member of staff involved didn't know the T&Cs I doubt the manager or assistant manager didn't.

    Edit: just read the article again and it does state at the bottom that it is a result of a multitude of !!!! ups by the staff involved.
  • Red_sky
    Red_sky Posts: 80 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm still waiting for a reply to my 3 letters sent to Laura Irvine head of Santander's ISA office (well at least that was the name used on the bottom of all their letters) which was in Glasgow. She still hasn't replied 3 years later. In the mean time I transferred my ISA else where.
  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Jarlawuk wrote: »
    I don't understand how it would get that far either personally. I mean just going by any banks standard complaints procedure, all efforts would be made to resolve the issue prior to it getting to the ombudsman, due the cost of the ombudsman being involved.
    It occurs to me that had the customer simply completed an ISA transfer form to another manager, the system would probably have just transferred it.

    There has been a forum post recently complaining about Santander staff advising a customer that they cannot add further funds to a current-year ISA if it has been transferred-in. The sick joke is, HMRC told him/her exactly the same. :rotfl:

    Forum advice given was to transfer the ISA then add a token payment to see if the system accepts or rejects it. Not heard how that went yet, though.
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.