We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mervyn King: "This was a bust without a boom"
Comments
-
Another nice bit of fantasy made up trolling by Graham from Devon.HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »I joined hpc about 2 months before I joined here.
So where is this quote from 2007?
Or do you now admit you're a liar?0 -
What's your point hamish? Is that there was no credit boom and that therefore the banks should double lending to businesses and mortgage lending? If so, I say again, it doesn't matter what went before, basle III is here to stay.0
-
Another nice bit of fantasy made up trolling by Graham from Devon.
Yes it's been happening a lot lately.
That and the endless playing of the man, not the ball, with all the "desperation" accusations every time he starts to lose the debate.
It's just a sign that his arguments are weak though, so best not to let it bother you.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
I've noticed it happen quite often too, it's quite sad that he can't grasp simple concepts and just derails threads because he doesn't like them. I'm starting to pity him, he should be grateful that we're educating him, some people are so ungrateful.HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Yes it's been happening a lot lately.
That and the endless playing of the man, not the ball, with all the "desperation" accusations every time he starts to lose the debate.
It's just a sign that his arguments are weak though, so best not to let it bother you.0 -
i suspect that what king meant is that CPI inflation didn't ever get [absurdly] high on his watch.
which is true but mostly irrelevant.FACT.0 -
You can smell hamish's desperation.0
-
You can smell hamish's desperation.
Oh good.
Another one to add to the "desperation index".
The more you resort to such comments, the weaker we know your argument is.
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
It's not desperation.
You see winning this argument is the key.
Once this petty squabble on an internet forum is won, everything goes back to how it was, GDP will be growing at 6% plus a year, inflation will be less than 2%, and Banks will be falling over themselves to lend to any tom !!!!!! or harry.
Nothing can be more important than winning this squabble.....the future of mankind hinges on it :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Just for a 'laugh' I read some of the speech itself. Funnily enough it, well, doesn't support any of the crap typed out by Hamish, not least his risible " This wasn't a lending led boom in the UK", embarassing even by his very low standards.
As per my guess above MK was only talking about there not being high CPI inflation. Of course there was a boom in lending. Even the most shameless estate agent's PR man would freely admit this.
The following is a direct quote BTW, no text left out, also nothing pasted from completely different sources a la Hamish:
"Let me start by pointing out what did not go wrong. In the five years before the onset of the crisis, across the industrialised world growth was steady and both unemployment and inflation were low and stable. Whether in this country, the United States or Europe, there was no unsustainable boom like that seen in the 1980s; this was a bust without a boom.
So what was the problem? In a nutshell, our banking and financial system overextended itself. That left it fragile and vulnerable to a sudden loss of confidence. The most obvious symptom was that banks were lending too much."
I don't like the speech at all, BTW. I can sum it up in a snippet: 'my job was to keep CPI inflation low, I did that, so none of what happened was my fault'.FACT.0 -
the_flying_pig wrote: »So what was the problem? In a nutshell, our banking and financial system overextended itself. That left it fragile and vulnerable to a sudden loss of confidence. The most obvious symptom was that banks were lending too much.".
Yes, we all agree the banks overextended themselves.
But as has been pointed out by Broadbent, Flanders and others, they weren't lending too much to UK borrowers.
UK lending standards, and UK borrowers, had next to nothing to do with the position the UK economy now finds itself in.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
