We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Service Charges/Sink Fund
OllyMorry
Posts: 1 Newbie
So I've seen a flat I really like and want to put down an offer.
However, the service charge is £180 a month, which I think is very steep.
The flat is one of 6 conversion flats in a large period Victorian building in South London. There are no communal gardens, merely a large drive at the front for parking.
The estate agent says part of the service charge goes into a sink fund.
She says the other residents are complaining the service charge is too high and are attempting to get it reduced.
Any advice please? Everything else about the flat is great, but I can't justify that amount in service charges.
Thanks
However, the service charge is £180 a month, which I think is very steep.
The flat is one of 6 conversion flats in a large period Victorian building in South London. There are no communal gardens, merely a large drive at the front for parking.
The estate agent says part of the service charge goes into a sink fund.
She says the other residents are complaining the service charge is too high and are attempting to get it reduced.
Any advice please? Everything else about the flat is great, but I can't justify that amount in service charges.
Thanks
0
Comments
-
I think that is very very high. What exactly are you getting for that? Does it cover any utilities?0
-
How much is in the sinking fund and is there any major work planned?0
-
The only advice I can give you is not to buy a flat with service charges you think are too high.
It would be extremely unlikely any leaseholders could get the charge reduced by a significant amount.
If it's a large Victorian house then the upkeep of the outside parts of the building, repainting etc could be quite high, as would the cost of any roof renewal needed, so these are the things that the sink fund would be for, once buildings insurance and management costs were deducted from the service charge.The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.0 -
I had a flat in a converted manor house. 10 flats in total. Needed a new roof ....
.... 250k
So you need a large reserve for old properties.0 -
On the contrary, such a high service charge works in your favour.
1st of all, it will put quite a lot of other buyers off.
2nd, these properties are expensive to maintain, and it is only sensible to put money into a sinking fund.
3rd, you and your neighbours-to-be can take over the management and make it cheaper if you can. (Google right to manage.) That will tend to increase the value of the property. You say that your neighbours-to-be are concerned about the level of service charges, so it may well be possible to galvanise them into action.
Contrast that situation with one where the service charge is very low. There may be no money in a sinking fund, and it may be necessary to put the service charge up in future.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
The answer is to ask the vendor to send you copy of the current years budget to see what it is made up of !
The comment that it is high is entirely based on it being more outlay that you planned for, nothing else.
Even in a Victorian conversion, which as posted are expensive to maintain, your service charge budget would include
-buildings insurance, and you have no information on the past claims history
if it is resident managed the companies liability insurance,
the additional costs of a managing agent,- neither residents or freeholder should do the work for free and an agent might be the only option for them,
-utilities, cleaning which can include window cleaning
-running repairs, a well managed block will often have not only the simple day to day items but planned annual drain clerances and gutter clearances
-the various statutory compliance matters from common parts and fire safety risk assessments annual accounting company secretarial costs and annual accounting
- and there may be complex services such as fire alarms entryphones and water pumps.
When it comes to the sinking fund a well costed plan will work through cyclical painting roofing drive way replacement utilities and services replacement, carpets etc,
And £180 pcm suddenly sounds cheap.
-Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0 -
When it comes to the sinking fund a well costed plan will work through cyclical painting roofing drive way replacement utilities and services replacement, carpets etc,
And people moan when they are suddenly faced with an enormous service charge bill one year for, say, re-roofing, because there is no sinking fund!RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Richard_Webster wrote: »And people moan when they are suddenly faced with an enormous service charge bill one year for, say, re-roofing, because there is no sinking fund!
or worse still the funds for that are beyond the immediate reach of the flat owners and the water starts to leak into the top flat and building.Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
