We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
car crashes through house after exchanging contracs
Options
Comments
-
Richard_Webster wrote: »Only if the contract follows the 4th edition of the Standard Conditions of Sale without amendment - the 5th Edition would oblige the buyer to complete as it essentially reverts to the Common Law position where it is the buyer's risk from exchange.
All this stuff about who is insured is interesting but the essential point is firs to establish liability under the contract and that depends on which version was being used.
Thanks. I was hoping that someone would point that out.
The practical solution to all this is that the car driver's insurance will pay.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Thanks. I was hoping that someone would point that out.
The practical solution to all this is that the car driver's insurance will pay.
Good point - though I would say that the chances of the car driver's insurer authorising a surveyor to inspect the damage, and then arranging for all the necessary works to be completed by the end of this month are less than zero.I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.0 -
Wouldn't there be a problem in that if the risk has been passed to the buyer of the insurance company not paying out as until completion the property doesn't belong to them ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards