We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Older than my Husband

2»

Comments

  • McKneff
    McKneff Posts: 38,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    xylophone wrote: »
    60 is the new 40, so they say....:D

    In my dreams :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
    and we will never, ever return.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    McKneff wrote: »
    In my dreams :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    I was told, 70 is the new 40!!

    My GP, the darling man, told me 'you're only young yet'. Bless him!

    Actrually when I got married for the first time in 1957 it was assumed that everyone would change to the so-called 'small stamp'. It was just 'what you did'. I did so, but very soon discovered my error when I wanted to claim unemployment benefit. My friends put me straight, and I changed back. Best thing I ever did.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • Archergirl
    Archergirl Posts: 1,894 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Things were different then, I wasn't allowed to join my firms pension scheme until I was 40. If you were 'staff' you could join sooner but I was a manual worker.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    Archergirl wrote: »
    Things were different then, I wasn't allowed to join my firms pension scheme until I was 40. If you were 'staff' you could join sooner but I was a manual worker.

    Paying NI contributions at full or reduced rate was one thing. Being in the firm's pension scheme was different.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Indeed. It is quite scary how many here confuse state, private and even personal pensions.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    McKneff wrote: »
    I wouldnt have laughed MargaretClare, I just wish I had had someone to show me the way when I was 17. I would gladly have paid full stamp had it been explained better to me, but hey ho, My OH and I manage very well, a little later on in life with 25 years of working age to go I suddenly found more sense and joined by company pension scheme and encouraged my OH to start one so its probably evened out over the years to be honest.

    I had been working for the then Ministry of Labour and National Service (this is the 1950s we're talking). I left, got married, moved to a different part of England. That marriage failed after a few weeks (although we subsequently got back together) but I went back home, and it was when I went to where I used to work and met my friends and former colleagues who explained it all to me in words of one syllable. When I went into the other office and asked to change, no one explained, not even a leaflet,which at least would happen now. It was just a widespread assumption that it was 'what you did'. When we got back together I was a student nurse and I was a bit more mature, a bit more worldly-wise by then.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • I was told, 70 is the new 40!!

    My GP, the darling man, told me 'you're only young yet'. Bless him!

    Actrually when I got married for the first time in 1957 it was assumed that everyone would change to the so-called 'small stamp'. It was just 'what you did'. I did so, but very soon discovered my error when I wanted to claim unemployment benefit. My friends put me straight, and I changed back. Best thing I ever did.

    I paid the 'small' stamp for a year, realised what a no-brainer it was , and changed back.

    I couldn't join a company pension scheme however until I was 46 and went back to full-time work. I managed to get ten years into the Local Government Pension Scheme before I gave up work to go and live in Spain eight years ago. Wish I could have paid more!

    We're now back in the UK and have remunerative part-time work as Home Sitters, but there is no pension scheme with that, LOL!

    I have been drawing my State Pension for two years and will draw my Local Government Pension sometime in the next two years.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    whitesatin wrote: »
    I don't remember ever being offered the option to pay the smaller stamp
    .

    Depends when you married and whether you then worked. The right to a smaller stamp for new brides was abolished in the 70s and those who already had it lost the right if they were out of the job market for 2 (??) years
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    dzug1 wrote: »
    Depends when you married and whether you then worked. The right to a smaller stamp for new brides was abolished in the 70s and those who already had it lost the right if they were out of the job market for 2 (??) years

    From memory, it was April 1978. Any woman who married after that date had no choice but to pay full NI contributions. Those working and paying the 'small stamp' were allowed to continue. You can imagine, the uproar there'd have been if the option had been removed for all, although I personally think that would have been better.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.