We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

E-On Threatening Court Action/Credit Affected

2»

Comments

  • undaunted
    undaunted Posts: 1,870 Forumite
    edited 13 April 2012 at 4:10PM
    A code of practice is just that - it does not place an obligation on the consumer or have any legal force.

    Personally I think 14 months is generous never mind two years and as for trying to read the meter how about suppliers send meter readers when most people are at home - eg evenings or weekends rather than just at their own convenience? - ensure meters are in places they can be accessed when you are not at home, try to ring the consumer & ask if they would mind reading the meter etc when they have failed etc.

    To my mind 6 months - two bills - would be more than enough to rely on an estimate for.

    It's about time the energy industry realised that they are a commercial service and not some form of dictatorship

    As to taking you to court, do you think you owe the money or not? Assuming you genuinely don't if they take you to court so what? Providing that they lose, incur some costs, you win etc, what is the worry?
  • chanz4
    chanz4 Posts: 11,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Xmas Saver!
    Would people be willing to pay more for out of hours readers? Someone after all has to pay for them. The soloution is smart metering, but the government and consumers dont like them and are no longer making they compulsary
    Don't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.
  • Terrylw1
    Terrylw1 Posts: 7,038 Forumite
    Its set at 14 months before data becomes crystallised and can only be changed (well, should be!) If the TDC open a trading dispute in which case. They extend to 24 months, but this is when the industry is underperforming...its happened over the years.

    This 14 month deadline covers any and all data affecting payments to distributors so its crucial to the sector operating. Its not about reads, but if its all been estimated for a year, getting a reading shoves in some firm data to settle on hence the supplier achieves targets, hence its a popular way which is in the customers interests.

    The subject of calls is preference since some customers seem to loathe it, but if they've tried to read it I can't see why not.

    It might be nice if suppliers woke up to the modern world and upon taking customers on, asked how and when they can be contacted as well as find a way to agree a date to call.

    Out of hours would be good, but it is all cost. It would also be better to stop going out to sites readers have got no chance of getting in without the customer there. Just old fashioned practice really from the days off wife bring at home with kids!
    :rotfl: It's better to live 1 year as a tiger than a lifetime as a worm...but then, whoever heard of a wormskin rug!!!:rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.