We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stupid 'Offers in excess of'
Options
Comments
-
Yes it was Express for us too.
The house was on at offers over £169950, so we offered 170, then 175, then 180, all of which were instantly dismissed.
So we asked what sort of price would start to get things moving, and he said they were looking for at least £195k!
The house was removed from the market, unsold, a couple of weeks later.
Paul0 -
If you do a search for Express on here, you'll find that they are notorious for their tactic of 'Offers in excess of £x' sale price, with the seller having been told to expect to achieve £x + 30% or whatever - and thus rejecting all offers which fall short of the promised extra margin.
It's unfair on sellers and buyers both.0 -
I read the ASA decisions and it is a bonehead one as it failed to understand value marketing or the underlying dispute.
All they need do is remove the qualifier that a discount was available and ride the interest in the market.
Otherwise the decision implies that a property that is valued accurately at £x but due to circumstances or the type of property exceeds that, the agent is guilty of misrepresentation.Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards