We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Personal Injury Trusts - can you set one up without a lawyer?
Comments
-
From the DWP website, "PC10S - A detailed guide to Pension Credit for advisers and others (September 2011)", Capital Disregards:
"Lump-sum personal injury (including vaccine damage) payments
If your customer or their partner received a lump-sum payment, which is not held in a trust fund, because of a personal injury we will ignore an equal amount of capital. If the payment was used to set up a trust fund we will ignore all capital in the trust – which may be more or less than the original payment – and any income gained from it."
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/specialist-guides/technical-guidance/pc10s-guide-to-pension-credit/capital-disregards/#personalinjury
No need to set up a trust.
:D:D 0 -
And for Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit:
"RR2 - A guide to Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit", Working It Out, Income and Capital, Compensation Payments:
People aged 60 or over
Compensation Payments made as a result of personal injury are ignored whether or not placed in a trust. [HB(SPC) Sch 6.17, CTB(SPC) Sch 4.17]
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/specialist-guides/technical-guidance/rr2-a-guide-to-housing-benefit/working-it-out/income-and-capital/0 -
How does that DWP advice square with the actual regulations?
HOUSING BENEFIT (PERSONS WHO HAVE ATTAINED THE QUALIFYING AGE FOR STATE PENSION CREDIT) REGULATIONS 2006
Schedule 6
17.—(1) An amount equal to the amount of any payment made in consequence of any personal injury to the claimant or, if the claimant has a partner, to the partner.
(2) Where the whole or part of the payment is administered–
(a) by the High Court or the County Court under Rule 21.11(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, or the Court of Protection, or on behalf of a person where the payment can only be disposed of by order or direction of any such court;
(b) in accordance with an order under Rule 36.14 of the Ordinary Cause Rules 1993(a) or under Rule 128 of those Rules; or
(c) in accordance with the terms of a trust established for the benefit of the claimant or his partner, the whole of the amount so administered.0 -
How does that DWP advice square with the actual regulations?
My guess would be that there might have been amendments since 2006. I believe the rules are so complex that every change to one benefit precipitates a bunch of changes to other benefits, trying to keep everything aligned. The CAB might be able to help you track down relevant amendments, if that's what you want to know.0 -
And for Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit:
"RR2 - A guide to Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit", Working It Out, Income and Capital, Compensation Payments:
People aged 60 or over
Compensation Payments made as a result of personal injury are ignored whether or not placed in a trust. [HB(SPC) Sch 6.17, CTB(SPC) Sch 4.17]
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/specialist-guides/technical-guidance/rr2-a-guide-to-housing-benefit/working-it-out/income-and-capital/
I'm confused. Are you now over 85 years old? If not, you were younger than 60 when you received the payment, or doesn't that matter?DMP Mutual Support Thread member 244
Quit smoking 13/05/2013
Joined Slimming World 02/12/13. Loss so far = 60lb in 28 weeks :j 18lb to go
0 -
skintandscared wrote: »I'm confused. Are you now over 85 years old? If not, you were younger than 60 when you received the payment, or doesn't that matter?
Unless/until I learn otherwise, I'm assuming that if the disregard only applied to awards received after the age of 60, it would say so.0 -
Unless/until I learn otherwise, I'm assuming that if the disregard only applied to awards received after the age of 60, it would say so.
I read that it does, to be honest. Otherwise why put in the age restriction? Anyone of any age could receive an award and stash it away until they're over 60. It makes the restriction completely redundant otherwise! I read it that the legislation applies if you receive the award and are aged over 60 at that time of receipt.DMP Mutual Support Thread member 244
Quit smoking 13/05/2013
Joined Slimming World 02/12/13. Loss so far = 60lb in 28 weeks :j 18lb to go
0 -
skintandscared wrote: »I read that it does, to be honest. Otherwise why put in the age restriction? Anyone of any age could receive an award and stash it away until they're over 60. It makes the restriction completely redundant otherwise! I read it that the legislation applies if you receive the award and are aged over 60 at that time of receipt.
Anyone of any age can receive a PI award and stash it away until they're over 60, by putting it in a trust.0 -
Anyone of any age can receive a PI award and stash it away until they're over 60, by putting it in a trust.
Yes they can, as long as they do it immediately!DMP Mutual Support Thread member 244
Quit smoking 13/05/2013
Joined Slimming World 02/12/13. Loss so far = 60lb in 28 weeks :j 18lb to go
0 -
I have looked at the Statutory Instruments that modify the 2006 Act and cannot find any supporting the RR2 comment - which specifically references paragraph 6.17 as above.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards