We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
is she liable???
homealone_2
Posts: 2,004 Forumite
my daughter along with 3 friends rented a house last year to share whilst doing their 2nd year at uni. they all left a cheque each as a deposit and went along there way. when the time came to move in they had heard nothing from one of their friends and even after many attempts to contact her she would not reply!! they then found a letter from the landlord saying her cheque had bounced. they finally contacted her and she said she would sort it. she didnt, and the next months rent being due soon the landlord said they would have to find a new no.4 to share. this they did really quickly thankfully and she paid her one months deposit and rent. they were really worried about making up the difference as the landlord said this new no. 4 did not wipe out what their friend owed. he did say he would sort out something but never said anymore. they are not getting close to end of lease and he is saying he wants them to add money owed, whic he says is 2 months rent totalling £600 onto the last months rent. saying they are all equally responsible as it was a joint tenacy. they are getting hold of lease agreement this week to read through as they dont remember much of what it said originally but are panicked they will have to pay up, is this true??? they are also now looking for a new property now and so will need as much money as possible for deposit on new flat??? where do they stand???
0
Comments
-
homealone wrote:he is saying he wants them to add money owed, whic he says is 2 months rent totalling £600 onto the last months rent. saying they are all equally responsible as it was a joint tenacy.
Yes, this is the normal term in a tenancy agreement - if one tenant doesn't pay, the others are liable! It's really for them to sort out with the friend who backed out.Warning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac
0 -
As a student I had exactly the same thing happen, people backing out but not telling you and expecting you to cough up to the financial costs. I guess since she never returned your calls she won't be rushing to throw money at you.
The landlord is not totally blameless here however, afraid to rock the boat he didn't immediately advise you that one girl had backed out, he should have notified the other signatures on the lease to give them time to find another person.0 -
thanks everyone not the news she wanted to hear but i feel alot better having now heard from mser's that she has no choice. valuable lesson she has learned. upsetting all round really as they were best friends for 11 years and we did so much for her over that time it is sad for it to end in this way!!!! watch out any other students out there!!!!!!0
-
homealone wrote:thanks everyone not the news she wanted to hear but i feel alot better having now heard from mser's that she has no choice. valuable lesson she has learned. upsetting all round really as they were best friends for 11 years and we did so much for her over that time it is sad for it to end in this way!!!! watch out any other students out there!!!!!!
They will have a case against the one who didn't pay, can be pursued via Small Claims.0 -
""The landlord is not totally blameless here however, afraid to rock the boat he didn't immediately advise you that one girl had backed out, he should have notified the other signatures on the lease to give them time to find another person.""
this is nothing whatsoever to do with the landlord - this is an irresponsible non-communicative tenant who cannot face up to her liabilities - Pleeeeease lets not start landlrd-bashing AGAIN - particularly when it is entirely inappropriate. The other tenants could, presumably, SEE that she had left ?0 -
No, from the OP, the tenants had not moved in! The landlord sent the letter about the bounced cheque to the rented property so the first they knew that one tenant had backed out was when they arrived at the property.clutton wrote:""The landlord is not totally blameless here however, afraid to rock the boat he didn't immediately advise you that one girl had backed out, he should have notified the other signatures on the lease to give them time to find another person.""
this is nothing whatsoever to do with the landlord - this is an irresponsible non-communicative tenant who cannot face up to her liabilities - Pleeeeease lets not start landlrd-bashing AGAIN - particularly when it is entirely inappropriate. The other tenants could, presumably, SEE that she had left ?
Surely the landlord must have known that they would not be there until the tenancy began and could have made some attempt to contact the other tenants at their existing addresses - there were three of them after all.Not even wrong0 -
Twopints wrote:No, from the OP, the tenants had not moved in! The landlord sent the letter about the bounced cheque to the rented property so the first they knew that one tenant had backed out was when they arrived at the property.
Surely the landlord must have known that they would not be there until the tenancy began and could have made some attempt to contact the other tenants at their existing addresses - there were three of them after all.
thanks for picking up on my points, was not trying to start any landlord bashing was just concerned that my daughter was going to be paying this money through no fault of her own. as you rightly pointed out it was not discovered till they moved in. there would be alot less rows on here if people read posts throughly before retalliating. i hope it ends here0 -
hi there, not much experience in this sort of thing but if all four tennants signed a legal tennancy then i would have thought you could have a case against her "friend" who never showed. She herself mustve know the cheque was going to bounce and she is 100% to blame for the current situation.
Just a thought but why are they looking to move to another property? Could you not strike a deal with the landlord that he'll forget the £600 owing if they sign up for another year with him. It'll save him time and money searching for new tennants and save you daughter the cost.
Peace and harmony all round (o:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards