Renewables: "talking 'bout my generation"

Kernel_Sanders

Oscargrouch wrote: »

Ahh, the Godfather of the thread has mentioned me.. What's me prize KS;

You may well be getting a horse's head in your bed.

InVestor_2

Kernel_Sanders wrote: »

Can you see the hypocrisy here?
That's not the point though. Oscar may be the most annoying contributor to this thread but he doesn't resort to abuse, whatever the provocation. If you cannot have a go at others in a more subtle way then I'd rather you didn't post at all. This would include posts like this...

No

As far as I recall, I've only responded to oscargrouch posts to me.

Seems fair enough

and, abuse? lol

edwink

InVestor wrote: »

No

As far as I recall, I've only responded to oscargrouch posts to me.

Seems fair enough

and, abuse? lol

Verbal and written abuse is a form of abusive behaviour involving the use of language.


To call someone stupid is therefore abuse!!!!

edwink

InVestor wrote: »

1.

I have been posting my income for quite a few months, no-one had a problem before.

Incorrect - I had a problem with it as it is meaningless just posting your income, so I just scrolled past your posts!!!

Martyn1981

jimjames wrote: »

December 33 Os
2013 comes in at 1032 Os for the year

Hiya Jim, mine came in at 791 Os (kWh/kWp). I'm pretty pleased with that. South facing at my location works out around 950 Os. And sunny Barry Island (of Gavin & Stacey fame) comes in around 1,000 O's. So I think percentage wise, low 80's is about right for me.

At the end of the day, it is, what it is, but I'm still a little envious of those near the 1,000 mark. Time for a tracker perhaps?

Mart.

Oscargrouch

If nobody minds, may I please post 0.36 O's for today...:rotfl:

and a total of 3.28 O's for the month to date...

I thank you all so much........

legoman62

0.4 O's today...cold and dull yet again, but Monday is going to be better:T

Oscargrouch

Oscargrouch wrote: »

0.36 O's for today...:rotfl:

legoman62 wrote: »

0.4 O's today...cold and dull yet again, but Monday is going to be better:T

Just for the record my 0.36 compared to Legoman's 0.4 comparison in O's is not too dissimilar. Whereas; 0.9 kWh v's 1.6 kWh expressed in kWh looks like a vast difference. Despite the fact that one system is on the NE Coast and tother is, well, more Souff... Plus we are all, at present, getting similar weather....

sly_dog_jonah

It has been a while since I've posted, the last few months have been pretty hectic since going freelance.

In that time our system has passed its second anniversary and has also completed its 2nd full calendar year. The table below show's annual performance against SAP and PVGIS-Classic estimates.

[FONT="Courier New"]                              Year 1     Year 2     2011*    2012     2013
Generation (kWh)              3539.7     3581.8     312.4    3529.2   3626.8
Performance vs SAP            +19.95%    +21.38%    +33.90%  +19.59%  +22.90%
Performance vs PVGIS-Classic  +10.50%    +11.82%    +23.36%  +10.17%  +13.22%

*installed 21/10/2011, SAP & PVGIS performance pro rata
PVGIS-Classic estimated generation: 3203.1 kWh [PVGIS-Climate SAF estimate for comparison is: 3260 kWh]
SAP Estimate: 2951 kWh
[/FONT]

2013 was a great year for generation in cider country (North Somerset), with only February and March not hitting the monthly PVGIS targets. July performance smashed the PVGIS target by 34%, and even October, November and December exceeded the target by >20%.

For anyone bored/annoyed by particular contributors, perhaps this would be a timely reminder of the Forum's 'Ignore' functionality, which collapses posts from users you've chosen to ignore. Click the username to the left of a post and select 'Add X to your ignore list'.

Oscargrouch

One 1.0 Ohh today...