📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Let to Buy? What's the catch?

Options
I've just spoken to a financial advisor about Let To Buy, which I'd never heard of before. So basically, he tells me I can carry on letting out my flat and release teh equity to buy a new place closer to work. Sounds great so - what's the catch? The main thing I cvan think of is just being liable for 2 mortgages in teh event of a rent void, but what else?

Anyone with any experience of this? Thanks.

Comments

  • Mrs_Z
    Mrs_Z Posts: 1,123 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    Catch?

    Well, you don't say which type of mortgage you have, but I'm assuming that at the moment you have a residential mortgage with a consent to let from your lender?

    If you were to do a let to buy, you'd get a commercial morgage which tend to have higher fees as well as interest rates.

    Second thing; you'll have the legal responsibilities of a landlord, but presumably you're aware of them already as you are already letting your flat.
  • betmunch
    betmunch Posts: 3,126 Forumite
    If you are aware of your responsibilities as a landlord then thats it really.

    Some people did Let to Buy without realising the trouble that the Let could cause and they came unstuck.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Yes, I currently have a residential mortgage with permission to let. So from these answers, my concerns would be that I would be put onto a commercial mortgage ata higher interest rate, and then of course would also have teh responsibility for 2 mortgages, in the event of a tenancy void. Plus I would still have to have a certain amount of money available for repairs and emergencies etc at the rental property. So it sounds good in principle but I think might be a bit risky if I don't have much money to spare to cover eventualities at the rented place.

    Thanks very much for the responses :-)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.