We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help!..Homeless!!!Deceived by Lettings Agency/Landlord
Comments
-
But thank you for the suggestion of Trading Standards, that was the comment I was looking for. I think I see a glimmer of hope now. They will certainly be reported to the Local Trading Standards and they will get far more than rants or rudeness because I am going to kick up a royal stink.
As suggested by previous posters you would be better off channeling your efforts into finding alternative accommadation. Trading Standards won't want to know. No laws have been broken.0 -
If you've got good credit and good references then I would be calling up letting agents around the same place as your new job.
Unfortunate situation but there is little you can do now. Whatever reason the LL had for pulling out of the deal is not relevant now and not worth wasting time thinking about it.0 -
Just so you know rubbish stuff happens to landlords too, a few months ago I agree to go with an application, turned down others, the day before the tenant was due to move in he lost his new job, had been employed for a few weeks in new company and was commuting and going to move in.Angie_pangie wrote: »Well, that's just the way the lettings industry is, I think quite a few of you are LLs and maybe it hurts to hear the obvious facts that you profit from this exploitative situation, I am only stating the scumminess of the whole industry and it's only purpose of exploiting tenants.
I have also found out that the property was listed with multiple agencies which meant deposit or no deposit you're not assured of a property and that the story of ..... LL's family friend in distress is lies, lies and nothing but lies, greed and apathy is what fuels this industry and the apathy that is all too apparent in the world today as evidenced by the comments above.
But thank you for the suggestion of Trading Standards, that was the comment I was looking for. I think I see a glimmer of hope now. They will certainly be reported to the Local Trading Standards and they will get far more than rants or rudeness because I am going to kick up a royal stink.
Of course he couldn't take on a new property, he had to be free to move where a job was and I felt worse for him than I did for me but I still lost quite a lot of money over it.
It's is not all roses being a landlord!0 -
Angie_pangie wrote: »Where do I begin? Not very helpful are you? Someone's about to be homeless and jobless and you're talking about the landlords rights, imaginary friend in distress when tenants in this country are being exploited left, right and centre by people cashing in on this problem, it's people like you that have encouraged this culture of exorbitant rentals for hardworking people living in the outskirts of the city while benefit scroungers live in the centre along with celebrities.
How do you know they are cashig in? They could be taking a hit to help the family friend out.
You're attack on that poster is a little OTT.0 -
Wow
I'm not a landlord but if I was I wouldn't want a drama queen like the OP as a tenent !
Talk about throwing her teddy out of the pram !
You've got given good advice. You've been told the LL has acted legally and your best move is to find somewhere else to rent ASAP and suggestions given how to find somewhere. Do you bother thanking people ....No you just rant some more . Time to grow up -These things happen in life. It may not be fair but life isn't fair . Give it a rest and stop ranting on at people who have tried to help you (and thanking them would simply be good manners).. Of course you'll probably do none of this and waste your valuable property hunting time ranting at Trading Standards -who will tell you what you've got told here-that it isn't illegal but they'll make a note of it -which may go against the letting agency if this isn't a one off and down solely to the LL but won't do a thing to help you find a new place to live !
Sheesh - Some people !!!I Would Rather Climb A Mountain Than Crawl Into A Hole
MSE Florida wedding .....no problem0 -
Agree with evevrything Duchy has said. You haven't heard what you want, so you rant and attack members. Wind your neck in and put your efforts into finding somewhere to live pronto. You'll have no one else to blame for being homeless at this rate. You sound like the tenant from hell. And like Duchy said, manners wouldn't go amiss.0
-
Angie_pangie wrote: »this culture of exorbitant rentals for hardworking people living in the outskirts of the city while benefit scroungers live in the centre along with celebrities.
I live in a city centre and I'm not a benefit scrounger0 -
So what HAVE you done so far? Did you sign any sort of tenancy agreement when you paid the deposit?
Personally I'd see the deposit paid as the property reserved, and on the basis that you wouldn't be able to pull out, then neither should they!
I would go down to the letting agency, camp out in their office, and demand that they either supply you with another property in the same area, at the same price, of the same standard, or you'll be billing them for the cost of having to store your stuff, the cost of the removal van, and the cost of a hotel until you can find something else.
Or threaten to camp out in their office and refuse to move until they find you something else?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
