We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Teen pregnancy rate lowest since 1969
Comments
-
RenovationMan wrote: »Yes I did. Your question was:
I responded:
You haven't answered my question.
I asked you are you a pa3dophile.
I asked you this after you said i had taken to hanging around schools.0 -
OK - I accept your challenge :j

:eek:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17190185
A 43 year low in the number of teenage pregnancies.
I don't expect it'll change the views of those who like to lay the blame for everything at the door of the "baby factories", "those paid to breed" or, just yesterday "lazy single mothers".I think....0 -
I asked you are you a pa3dophile.
I asked you this after you said i had taken to hanging around schools.
Yes, and I answered:RenovationMan wrote: »Erm, you're the one who's hanging around school looking at the mum's attire, not me. Do you not remember saying it? It was only a few posts ago. I guess it's hard to keep track of what you are saying when you have so many usernames on the go?0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »Yes, and I answered:
There is no answer there.
You labelled me a !!!!!!.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked you if you were a !!!!!!.0 -
There is no answer there.
You labelled me a !!!!!!.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked you if you were a !!!!!!.
You labelled yourself as that. You said you saw lots of mums dropping off their kids at school while still wearing their pyjamas. You have never mentioned that you had kids (unlike myself) and so I didn't see any reason for you to be near these schools and so I asked if you had started hanging around schools instead of building sites now.
My answer to your question of whether I was a '!!!!!!' was that you were the person hanging around schools, looking at mum's attire, not me. Logic you see, you're hanging around schools enough to notice the Mum's clothing and I am not. Therefore, no I am not.0 -
Thats a bit far to go for a job interview dont you think.
It's you that wants to be an astronaut not me.
Maybe you could go to Alton Towers (it's quite a long way from your estate but you won't need a passport) and as a first step get a photo of yourself on Nemesis. If you send that to NASA I bet they'll be impressed with your commitment.
I don't mind helping out with a bit of mentoring but I can't do it all for you Jimmy.0 -
So, why is a bloke with no kids hanging around schools often enough to notice the Mum's clothing?0
-
It's you that wants to be an astronaut not me.
Maybe you could go to Alton Towers (it's quite a long way from your estate but you won't need a passport) and as a first step get a photo of yourself on Nemesis. If you send that to NASA I bet they'll be impressed with your commitment.
I don't mind helping out with a bit of mentoring but I can't do it all for you Jimmy.
I went on a school trip to alton towers once, and upon leaving my teacher was told not to bring my class back ever again.
I wouldnt want to risk going back only to be told i am on amusement park watch and will not be gaining entry.0 -
freddiesmum09 wrote: »I am not heaping sympathy on them at all, I am just stating my beliefs. The british education system favours children from affulent areas.. Children from poorer areas (generally) go to schools in poorer areas (their catchment schools) and those schools are generally not doing as well as schools in affulent areas due to lack of parental interest in their childs education/lack on money for extra curricular activities (parents don't want to/dont have the money to pay)/lack of willingness to learn as child has no positive role models who work (no reason to learn?!)/worse behaviour on average which means more teaching time is spent on things it shouldn't be..
The odds are stacked against some of these children from the ages of four and five... its hardly rocket science how some of them give up and cave in to what they believe is the 'easier option'
Its poor genetic background. Thats why people living on sink estates shouldnt be encouraged to breed.0 -
I went on a school trip to alton towers once, and upon leaving my teacher was told not to bring my class back ever again.
I wouldnt want to risk going back only to be told i am on amusement park watch and will not be gaining entry.
You were just pretending you wanted to leave your estate weren't you?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
