We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
15 minutes wating on IR phone and counting...
Options

downshifted
Posts: 1,168 Forumite


in Cutting tax
and it's an 0845 number....
Downshifted
September GC £251.21/£250 October £248.82/£250 January £159.53/£200
September GC £251.21/£250 October £248.82/£250 January £159.53/£200
0
Comments
-
downshifted wrote: »and it's an 0845 number....
Then phone after 7pm or early Saturday morning when you might have 0845 as part of your call package.
Or try saynoto0870 for an alternative number.0 -
they answered after 20 mins - and did resolve my queryDownshifted
September GC £251.21/£250 October £248.82/£250 January £159.53/£2000 -
downshifted wrote: »they answered after 20 mins - and did resolve my query
It's iniquitous how HMRC waste our post tax moneyThe only thing that is constant is change.0 -
zygurat789 wrote: »The charge starts as soon as the ringing tone finishes and these calls are more expensive than normal codes.
It's iniquitous how HMRC waste our post tax money
Also just for advice, the number on the 'NO to 0870' website is the telephone number for the International Helpline, for those calling from abroad who cannot use the 0845 number.
This number has now been blocked to anyone calling from a UK landline.
HMRC can also terminate your call after providing you with the correct number should you get through by alternative means whilst calling from within the UK.[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
write to your MP and complain; sadly too few people bother0
-
write to your MP and complain; sadly too few people bother
I fail to see how that will help.
The problem is there are too few advisors on the phone to deal with the volume of calls, and with 710,000 civil servants due to lose their jobs over the next 3-4 years, the problem is only going to get worse as fewer and fewer advisors are available.
It will become even worse once the Govt get their wish and privatise HMRC contact centres.[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
Also just for advice, the number on the 'NO to 0870' website is the telephone number for the International Helpline, for those calling from abroad who cannot use the 0845 number.
Anyone phoning from a mobile will find an 0845 number very expensive. Why does HMRC persist in using 0845 numbers as opposed to geographical numbers which are included in most calling plans including mobiles?0 -
"It will become even worse once the Govt get their wish and privatise HMRC contact centres."
It's well worth the risk. if the current service was even halfway decent then outsourcing would be a risk. Given that the current service is pants the risk is minimal, so go for it!Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies0 -
Anyone phoning from a mobile will find an 0845 number very expensive. Why does HMRC persist in using 0845 numbers as opposed to geographical numbers which are included in most calling plans including mobiles?
Nobody is forced to phone from a mobile[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
The problem is there are too few advisors on the phone to deal with the volume of calls, and with 710,000 civil servants due to lose their jobs over the next 3-4 years, the problem is only going to get worse as fewer and fewer advisors are available.
No, the problem is that HMRC make far too many mistakes, necessitating people to phone in, possibly several times, before the mistake is rectified. If HMRC improved their service, didn't make silly mistakes, or then actually corrected the problem when they were first contacted, then the volume of calls would plummet.
Sadly it's common to have to write or phone 2,3, or 4 times before HMRC do the job properly. Simple things like phoning up to correct a wrong tax code - hardly ever done right at first attempt - more often that not, no action taken at all, and even if a new code is issued, it's probably not what's been asked for so needs asking for again. It's quite ridiculous.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards