📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

15 minutes wating on IR phone and counting...

Options
24

Comments

  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Pennywise wrote: »
    No, the problem is that HMRC make far too many mistakes, necessitating people to phone in, possibly several times, before the mistake is rectified. If HMRC improved their service, didn't make silly mistakes, or then actually corrected the problem when they were first contacted, then the volume of calls would plummet.

    Sadly it's common to have to write or phone 2,3, or 4 times before HMRC do the job properly. Simple things like phoning up to correct a wrong tax code - hardly ever done right at first attempt - more often that not, no action taken at all, and even if a new code is issued, it's probably not what's been asked for so needs asking for again. It's quite ridiculous.
    Complete and utter C R A P!!!!!
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • chrismac1
    chrismac1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    I agree, it's more like 6 or 7 times before they do their job properly!
    Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,618 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 15 February 2012 at 9:33PM
    dori2o wrote: »
    The vast majority of all government services use 0845/0345 numbers.

    Why are 0845 numbers being used? Do they create extra revenue for the company being called?

    More and more government services are switching to 0345 which would be fine as that is inclusive on all calling plans.

    So why isn't HMRC using 0345?

    Why are they blocking the use of alternative 01 numbers.

    I'm sorry but I think it's wrong.
    Nobody is forced to phone from a mobile

    There are some who don't have a landline, only a mobile. Should they find a phonebox or something?
  • jem16 wrote: »
    There are some who don't have a landline, only a mobile. Should they find a phonebox or something?

    Which are even more horrendously overpriced...
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,618 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    dtaylor84 wrote: »
    Which are even more horrendously overpriced...

    Not actually sure which is worse for 0845, a phonebox or a mobile. Neither should have to be used for 0845 though when there is no need for it.
  • AirlieBird
    AirlieBird Posts: 1,046 Forumite
    edited 15 February 2012 at 11:48PM
    jem16 wrote: »
    So why isn't HMRC using 0345?
    The Minister responsible for HMRC said in a written answer to parliament in October 2011:
    "...HMRC recognises that the cost of calling its 0845 numbers can be an issue for some customers—particularly those using pay-as-you-go mobile phones. It has therefore been actively reviewing its numbering strategy to see if it can find ways of reducing the costs involved while striking the right balance between costs to the caller and costs to the public purse.

    I can confirm that as part of the process of agreeing its next telephony contract—which is due to take effect by June 2013—HMRC will continue to investigate alternatives to 0845 numbers."
    Did you really mean to put loose?
    Lose: no longer possess, not to retain, unable to find
    Loose: not firmly or tightly fixed in place
  • Zorz_2
    Zorz_2 Posts: 324 Forumite
    100 Posts
    dori2o wrote: »
    Nobody is forced to phone from a mobile

    I live in a flat without landline. Unfortunately, Cpt. Blackadder shot my last carrier pigeon. What do you suggest me to do?
    You wanna hear about my new obsession?
    I'm riding high upon a deep recession...
  • chrismac1
    chrismac1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    Buy a new pigeon and train it to home in on your local tax office. This may not solve your tax issue, but at least the thought of all that poo dropping on HMRC from a height will boost your morale.
    Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies
  • chrismac1
    chrismac1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    On a more serious note, how hard can it be to allow e-mails? I recently dealt with the Revenue Service of Ireland on a matter involving imports from the USA and potentailly £250k of VAT if things were done wrongly. They accepted an e-mail and replied with their opinion by e-mail, all within 4 hours. That sort of thing is so totally unthinkable in the UK that it's just depressing even thinking about it.
    Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    chrismac1 wrote: »
    On a more serious note, how hard can it be to allow e-mails? I recently dealt with the Revenue Service of Ireland on a matter involving imports from the USA and potentailly £250k of VAT if things were done wrongly. They accepted an e-mail and replied with their opinion by e-mail, all within 4 hours. That sort of thing is so totally unthinkable in the UK that it's just depressing even thinking about it.

    For a general enquiry that is fine and it is coming. However, would you honestly want peoples records being updated, tax codes changed etc etc by email? ID fraud is currently at it's highest recorded rate, How would the emails be verified as genuine.

    It's not secure enough to do so, thats why it isn't done.

    How many banks do you know will deal with specific account queries (transfers/payments/direct debits) by Email?
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.