We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
vacancy advertising?
Sosotired
Posts: 71 Forumite
Does an employer have to advertise a vacancy, internally in the first instance, before filling it?
0
Comments
-
no, this is not required.0
-
SOME employers may have a policy of doing this, but even if they do the policy can be ignored if there's enough justification.Signature removed for peace of mind0
-
And some do everything in their power NOT to promote from within.. sigh...0
-
Most companies advertise both internally and externally at the same time. I have only worked for one company where they advertised internally first, interviewed candidates and then when they were not suitable for the role advertised it externally. Personally I think that was the better way to do it because more often than not the role goes to an internal candidate.0
-
Does an employer have to advertise a vacancy, internally in the first instance, before filling it?
No they do not have to.Most companies advertise both internally and externally at the same time.
But that's a company policy - the question was 'do they have to' and no - they do not have to.If you haven't got it - please don't flaunt it. TIA.0 -
Most companies advertise both internally and externally at the same time. I have only worked for one company where they advertised internally first, interviewed candidates and then when they were not suitable for the role advertised it externally. Personally I think that was the better way to do it because more often than not the role goes to an internal candidate.
If that is true, and I suspect it is based on your own limited experience rather than any hard evidence, then it is because they choose to, not because they have to.0 -
If that is true, and I suspect it is based on your own limited experience rather than any hard evidence, then it is because they choose to, not because they have to.
Which is why I said my personal opinion was that I think that it is better that they advertise internally first before advertising externally.
We all know that it is up to the company how they do it, but yes from PERSONAL LIMITED experience as you put it, is what I have found.0 -
Which is why I said my personal opinion was that I think that it is better that they advertise internally first before advertising externally.
Er, no you didn't - you stated it as a fact without any qualification or suggestion that it was an opinion:Most companies advertise both internally and externally at the same time.0 -
Which is why I said my personal opinion was that I think that it is better that they advertise internally first before advertising externally.
We all know that it is up to the company how they do it, but yes from PERSONAL LIMITED experience as you put it, is what I have found.
The question wasn't 'what's your opinion on this' - it was 'do they have to'. And no, they don't.If you haven't got it - please don't flaunt it. TIA.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards