We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

I dont get it, all homes are second hand aren't they?

24

Comments

  • Soot2006
    Soot2006 Posts: 2,184 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pioneer22 wrote: »
    Yes with the point that once you move in they are no longer 'new'

    They're still new in the sense of shiny ... but no longer new in the eyes of a lender.
  • I don't like new builds because
    1. You pay a premium (like buying a new car - depreciates quicker at the beginning)
    2. The developers may sell the rest of the estate to a housing association
    3. The developer may have a social housing quota to fill
    4. They have small rooms and small windows (building regs are to blame for the windows)
  • I think one of the major criticisms of new houses now is the density of build. For some time, gardens have been small and parking has been limited, as most developers look to fit as many homes as possible into their site.

    These problems will always be there, how ever many times the house is sold in the future. Therefore, once the new build gloss is gone, a house must compete, price wise, against similar size homes that are older and often far larger, both in terms of room size and more importantly plot size.
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    Eton_Rifle wrote: »
    Perhaps the OP feels that people look down on new houses?
    ?


    some of us do of course, but to OP - it is whatever floats your boat !
  • Running_Horse
    Running_Horse Posts: 11,809 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I'm guessing by new build, you mean modern.

    Some people don't like modern houses. Some people don't like modern cars. Some people don't like modern music. Some people don't like modern fashion.

    Some people do.
    Been away for a while.
  • Uk_Lover
    Uk_Lover Posts: 209 Forumite
    It's easy to make a new build look old. Plenty of new houses round my way that are stunning. But they are all new build individual detached huge houses 1mill plus.New build estates I don't like, thin plasterboard walls, no character, small gardens etc, not for me but plenty like them which is fine as it leaves more old houses for me !
  • JimmyTheWig
    JimmyTheWig Posts: 12,199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    pioneer22 wrote: »
    People talk about new build houses when they have been sold as being 2nd hand. Unless you move in a new build all homes are 2nd 3rd 4th hand aren't they? So why when people are being critical about people buying a newly built home?
    People are critical because when you buy a new build you pay over the odds because it is brand new. When you then sell it, it's not brand new (as you've pointed out) so you can't sell it for over the odds. So you lose money.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    pioneer22 wrote: »
    Yes with the point that once you move in they are no longer 'new'

    Actually I understand pioneer22 point.

    It is the owner of new home that buys a new house and cannot understand why it is no longer "new", which is an emotive way of trying to verbalise the depreciation that occurs.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Actually I understand pioneer22 point.

    It is the owner of new home that buys a new house and cannot understand why it is no longer "new", which is an emotive way of trying to verbalise the depreciation that occurs.

    Quite the opposite in fact.
  • People are critical because when you buy a new build you pay over the odds because it is brand new. When you then sell it, it's not brand new (as you've pointed out) so you can't sell it for over the odds. So you lose money.

    This point has cleared it up for for me when you put it like that.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.