We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can I dispose of half share in house?

I own a half share in a house with my Mum. She still lives in the house - i have not lived in it for over 18 years. My son lives with her together with his ex-girlfriend. No tenancy agreement in place and neither of them pay any rent.

No mortgage on house.

Relationship has broken down. I do not want my half share. Can I give it back to Mum without any tax implications for me.

Any advice ratly appreciated.
Debt free and Keeping on Track
«1

Comments

  • dancingfairy
    dancingfairy Posts: 9,069 Forumite
    Not easily I don't think.
    You may not want anything more to do with the house but your mother will probably need to get a remortgage (if possible) in her name alone - the bank will not just allow you to come off the mortgage as they obviously have 2 people to chase at the moment if the mortgage goes unpaid.
    Is there any equity or is it negative equity?
    df
    Making my money go further with MSE :j
    How much can I save in 2012 challenge
    75/1200 :eek:
  • Annisele
    Annisele Posts: 4,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    OP says there's no mortgage on the house, so the bank shouldn't be an issue.

    Capital Gains Tax might be an issue. That is paid when an asset is disposed of - not just when it's sold. The OP may be able to claim various reliefs (almost certainly can), but there is a possibility tax will need to be paid. That would depend on how much the house was worth when OP bought it, how much it is worth now, whether OP has ever lived in it, and lots of other things (I'm not an expert on CGT, so I can't give a full list).
  • MrsPorridge
    MrsPorridge Posts: 2,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks.

    No mortgage on house paid off before Ihalf was put in my name. House has gone up in value as is in London. Not sure but was bought in the 70's so value will be considerable compared to when it was bought.

    Biggest problem is son and ex who may want to remain living there when Mum has gone. I have no relationship with them and do not want to support them and cannot afford upkeep of house. I am in my fifties and have own home with husband.

    Am worried about them being sitting tenants and my being responsible for hours and council tax etc.

    Mumwill leave her half of house to son.
    Debt free and Keeping on Track
  • BigAunty
    BigAunty Posts: 8,310 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ... Can I give it back to Mum without any tax implications for me.

    .

    I don't know about tax implications but those who apply for means tested benefits can be subject to an investigation for giving away their capital if the DWP/HMRC believe that it was motivated by a desire to claim benefits, to get under the threshold for capital to be eligible. It's known as deprivation of capital.
  • dancingfairy
    dancingfairy Posts: 9,069 Forumite
    ooops- I missed the bit about no mortgage - sorry.
    I would assume that you would also need to be careful in terms of 'deprivation of assets'. My understanding is that if you needed to claim any menas tested benefits in the near future then they could assume that you gave the share in the house away in order to claim benefits. Hopefully you won't be needing any state help anytime soon but you might want to bear it in mind.
    In terms of CGT etc perhaps the cutting tax board would be able to help as they have some tax experts on there.
    Best of Luck
    df
    Making my money go further with MSE :j
    How much can I save in 2012 challenge
    75/1200 :eek:
  • MrsPorridge
    MrsPorridge Posts: 2,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Am wanting to give away for reasons in my above post. I work full time always have and do not claim any benefits.
    Debt free and Keeping on Track
  • dancingfairy
    dancingfairy Posts: 9,069 Forumite
    I didn't mean that that was why you were doing it but more that if by some unfortunate circumstance you needed to claim that you may have to argue that it wasn't done for that reason. Obviously the fact you moved out/ haven't paid anything for 18 years is a pretty good reason.
    df
    Making my money go further with MSE :j
    How much can I save in 2012 challenge
    75/1200 :eek:
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 31 January 2012 at 9:02PM
    Capital Gains Tax

    you have not lived in it for 18 years therefore you are certainly liable for CGT - please explain how your acquired it in the first place - did you buy, or did you inherit, your half share ? This determines the basis of your original cost and when the clock starts for the CGT calculation

    option a) your hlf is returned to Mum

    If you give for free (or sell for cash) your half share back to her that will create a "disposal event" and CGT will be due at the time of that transaction.

    you are related to your mother :p and are therefore classed as a "connected person". This means that "sales" value used in the CGT calculation must be the full open market value at the time of the transaction, ie you cannot say it's a free gift or use a discounted value

    there will be a complication in how you determine what is the market value as it is not the same as simply half of the house value. No one would buy half a house and a house with a resident co-owner is also going to reduce the value - ie you would probably need to get a specialist valuer to advise you

    option b) mum and you agree to place whole property on market

    Mum as resident owner in her main home will be free of CGT. You as non resident owner will incur CGT on your half of the value. Sold on the open market to a third party without your half going through Mum first there will be no problems with connected person rule or valuation basis - you will simply pay CGT on the differncne between what it sellls for and what it cost x 50%

    current occupants

    mum obviously is an owner occupier so cannot be forced out - if she will not willingly agree to sell (option b above) then the obnly way to force her would be to take her to court as only a court can force a sale if one owner resists


    To create a tenancy either a written agreement has to be in place (which could of course be for zero rent) or, if no written agreement in place, then rent has to actually be paid - so son and ex appear to have no legal interest in the property. They have not paid rent to you or Mum therefore a tenancy has not been created. However, as you are not resident then turfing out your univited "guests" is not as simple as if you were resident - someone else wil have to cover that, I don't know the legal process there, for example if Mum leaves but they stay on they could be squatters

    council tax

    this is governed by the rules of "hierarchy of liability" this dictates who pays the bill in a very strict order - a resident owner comes first, a resident tenant comes next (not applicable in your case) then any resident even a squatter (possibly the stauts of son and ex if they stay on) and then only after all that lot comes a non resident owner ie. you! So Mum will be laible for 100% of bill as long as she is there , if she and son/ex all move out, you and Mum are jointly and separately liable, ie council can persue you or her for 100% - it is not split 50/50
  • MrsPorridge
    MrsPorridge Posts: 2,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    OK thanks for all that. So if we leave it as it is then when mum goes what are my rights for forcing a sale? Will son be liable for CGT and inheritance tax?
    Debt free and Keeping on Track
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 31 January 2012 at 9:49PM
    OK thanks for all that. So if we leave it as it is then when mum goes what are my rights for forcing a sale? Will son be liable for CGT and inheritance tax?

    sorry but unclear what you mean mum "going"? Do you mean she dies or she (willingly) vacates the property?

    if the latter, then she will still be the legal owner of her 1/2 share and would either have to willingly agree to sell it or, if not, you'd still need to force her to sell via court

    don't see where son/ex fit into that scenario - but if she instead gifts her share to son/ex whilst still alive and eitehr moves out or continues to live there then they would become the co-owner with you and your Mum would be in the same position re CGT as option a) on my first post

    IHT
    Remember IHT is payable by the estate not the beneficaries and only applies to estates over £325,000

    a)Mum continues to live there until she eventually dies but transfers her share to son/ex whilst she is still alive - this is a Gift With Reservation. A GWR means Mum's ESTATE remains liable for IHT on the full value of the property at time of her death as she has continued to benefit from (live in) the asset she gifted. If the estate does not have the cash to pay the IHT (if any is due) then the executors of the will have the power to sell the house to raise the cash to pay the tax - who are the executors???????

    b) Mum lives on but moves out and transfers her half to you or son or ex - this is called a Potentially Exempt Transfer. Under a PET Mum has to live for another 7 years after which time the gift is free of IHT. Son/ex are then the owners and are free to do with it what they want - if you want to sell your half you'd have to take them to court as they are the owners not your Mum

    c) Mum dies whilst in residence and her will leaves it to son/ex - Mum's estate pays the IHT (if applicable) on her share and Son/ex inherit her half becoming co-owners with you so you would need to deal with them if you want to sell up your half
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.