We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is this covered by distance selling regulations?
Options
Comments
-
The first email I received when I booked gives no date or time. The second email says the first session was Thursday the 12th at 6.30pm. The second email giving the start date and time was received at 2pm on the 13th.Debt January 1st 2018 £96,999.81Met NIM 23/06/2008
Debt September 20th 2022 £2991.68- 96.92% paid off0 -
I suppose the question that needs to be asked is, "when does the service commence?" Does it commence from the time and date of the first session, or the time and date of the first available session?The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0
-
I would presume that it is when the service is available to the consumer. Otherwise mobile phone companies, broadband providers, gyms etc would have you tied to a contract the moment you signed up because they are already providing the service - just not to you.
Something interesting to point out to them OP even if the cancellation rights do not apply (sort of a back up plan if you will).....unfair contract terms. Where a cancellation penalty is for the full amount/large amount of the contract and is not a genuine pre-estimate of actual loss, it will likely be considered a penalty and as such, is unenforceable. They have a right to recover actual losses that have arose as a result of a breach of contract. If they have 12 places left still, that loss is nil - perhaps a small administration charge but nothing more.5.1 It is unfair to impose disproportionate sanctions for breach of contract. A
requirement to pay more in compensation for a breach than a reasonable
pre-estimate of the loss caused to the supplier is one kind of excessive
penalty. Such a requirement will, in any case, normally be void to the
extent that it amounts to a penalty under English common law. Other types
of disproportionate sanction are considered below – Part III, Group 18(c).You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
you need a new hobby :exclamati0
-
No...you really need to read what you type..it is wrong so many times. Slow down...it's not a competition.
And not everyones first language is english. Mines certainly isnt.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards