We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Company Administration

Hi,
If a company that sold you the ppi on a loan goes into administation,can you claim a refund off the finance company instead.
regards

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,233 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    llew99 wrote: »
    Hi,
    If a company that sold you the ppi on a loan goes into administation,can you claim a refund off the finance company instead.
    regards

    In some cases no. However, in some cases yes. In some cases you need to go to the FSCS.

    It usually depends on the type of debt, the status of the broker/agent, the date and the regulatory body that existed at the time.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh wrote: »
    In some cases no. However, in some cases yes. In some cases you need to go to the FSCS.

    It usually depends on the type of debt, the status of the broker/agent, the date and the regulatory body that existed at the time.


    For a sale on or after 14 January 2005, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme seems to be the correct port of call.

    But in either case, you could do so in respect of a purchase that was above £100 and under (depending on when you took it out) £15,000 or £25,000 - so that it fell under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

    We are talking, though, of the purchase of the PPI policy, not the main loan. So if you borrowed between £100 and £15/£25K extra for a single premium PPI policy then the lender would seem to be liable under Section 75 of the Act.

    (This would rule out monthly premium PPI because you would be paying as you go and therefore not borrowing but most single premium plans would be covered).

    Whether you could then take the lender to the Financial Ombudsman Service is a bit more complicated.

    Events relating to consumer credit that took place on or after 6 April 2007 are under its jurisdiction but, as I have said, you can claim to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme for them anyway.

    However, if the lender voluntarily subjected itself to FOS jurisdiction at the time the loan was taken out, I think you have an arguable case - particularly if the broker then went on to become directly subject to FOS jurisdiction in its own right before its demise.

    If the lender was a High Street bank or building society then almost definitely FOS will consider whether it has jurisdiction (which does not mean it will conclude it has, let alone uphold a complaint).

    However, you need to explain to the lender that you are pursuing it under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and, if necessary, you must explain to FOS that your complaint is that it has failed to honour its obligations under Section 75.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.