We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Questions about selling a shared ownership property after staircasing to 100%?

2»

Comments

  • Another point - some SO leases effectively prevent a final staircasing followed by a sale within 3 months of each other so you have to find the money to buy in the final portion - you cannot do it "back to back".

    Worth checking whether that trap is in the wording.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • helger
    helger Posts: 44 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Pretty standard sort of clause. A lot of Councils want to make sure that when they give planning permission for "affordable housing" as part of an overall development - that it stays "affordable housing". There is politics behind this.

    The Council tries to impose a planning (s106) agreement on the builder and the HA in question to stop it going on to the open market. HA's solicitor won't agree that because he knows people couldn't get mortgagees if there were absolute restrictions, so HA agrees to a whole load of restrictions like this which they sell to the Council as giving the HA the ability to retain the property in quasi-public ownership. I suspect the reality is that HAs will rarely have the money to buy in the 100%.

    The practical problem is that you at least have to go through the hoop of asking them and waiting around for them to reply when you want to sell.

    If you buy from a Council under Right to Buy now you have to accept a further pre-emption period after the end of the initial 5 years where you have to offer the property back to a Council at full market value, so this kind of restriction is increasingly common in the case of "affordable housing".

    Many thanks, Richard. I must say you are an expert!

    Personally, I do not against first offering back to the HA. I simply do not want to use their service to sell the property for 8 weeks with a big fee even after my Final Staircasing to 100%.

    From your perspective, is it possible to negotiate about removing the application of option (iii) after my Final Staircasing to 100% from the lease? Or is it just a standard lease and can not be changed at all, i.e. whether accept it or walk away?
  • From your perspective, is it possible to negotiate about removing the application of option (iii) after my Final Staircasing to 100% from the lease? Or is it just a standard lease and can not be changed at all, i.e. whether accept it or walk away?

    I doubt whether you will get anywhere in trying to remove the clause because some of these things are decided at fairly high levels.

    I would suggest in practice they are not going to exercise the right and when you come to sell it you should be able to get them to write to you confirming they are not going to try to find a buyer. After all, if it is at a market value, the potential buyers are going to be looking through estate agents and not through HAs.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • Taiko
    Taiko Posts: 2,743 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Just from experience buying, the HA tend not to buy back. I'm hoping when I come to sell, it should be straightforward. At least I'm prepared for the pre-emption, my vendor wasn't!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.