We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Older generation want too much too late
Comments
-
moneyinmypocket wrote: »Your picking and choosing many of the good bits, times where tough back then - medical care is much better putting cost on having a loved one around longer can't be done
If your schooling was half as decent as you old codgers like to make out, you'd be aware that medical care has been improving for thousands of years and is total irrelevant to this discussion.0 -
Houses were cheap because interest rates were so high. In my 20's it wasn't unusual for people to spend 40% of their incomes on their mortgage payments. I assume you count me as older. I'm 44.
Edit: oh, yes, and house prices falling by a third...while interest rates touched 17% for some. Low interest rates like these would have been like a gift from the gods when we were in negative equity..but we had to keep meeting ever-rising interest payments *and* save up half our home's value just to be able to start again...
I remember taking Marmite sandwiches to work because cheese was too extravagant...import this0 -
The older generation had cheap houses, free university, well paid jobs, good pensions, free dental care, miras, low stamp duty, low council rates, low taxes and good state benefits. Now they want the young (many of whom have to take low paid jobs and/or are saddled with ever rising university debts) to:
- To buy their houses at fantasy prices.
- Work like slaves to provide them with health care and pensions in their old age
I have never met anyone from the older generation who wants these things for young people. I meet people from the older generation who just lived the last 50 years as best they could and are probably a bit miffed about where we are right now.
I get bored of the constant over-simplified generalisations of generations on here.0 -
The older generation had cheap houses, free university, well paid jobs, good pensions, free dental care, miras, low stamp duty, low council rates, low taxes and good state benefits. Now they want the young (many of whom have to take low paid jobs and/or are saddled with ever rising university debts) to:
- To buy their houses at fantasy prices.
- Work like slaves to provide them with health care and pensions in their old age
oh no not another one....... re your house issue, I'm 43 and I DONT want you to buy your house at these ridiculous prices. If you all said, 'right this is too high i'm not paying that' then the problem would ease, but so many 'have' to buy (usually on a scheme) and push up the prices for the rest of you, so tell your mates to hold fire!
For the record, my house was £34k when i bought it in 1990. I would be happy if it were still worth £34k now after all its the same house it was then!, but cicumstances out of my control have pushed it to stupid levels..... don't get angry with the older generation!!
winging does not help, so think about prices and if they are too high, forget about them, let some other poor soul buy that overpriced cardboard house on a complicated shceme whereby they will be stuck for years to come. Wait and save and it will come to you in the end I assure you!!0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »I missed this the first time round!
How many more people claim benefits now than used to be the case when some of us were young and how many more different situations are covered?
Which is what makes life harder for many of those today that will work hell or high water, we have to pay for it.
And it is no joke having for many young adults having to watch some lazy(neverworked)tart knock out a handfull of kids with different fathers and live in better housing than the man/woman going to work at 7am. And this is not a unusual scenario these days, some areas have one in every three houses where people have never worked.
So your argument that it was tougher back then because you never had welfare like today is good that you never. And lets not forget that it is the young workers today working to pay for the Bankers !!!! ups as well as(and lets not let them off the hook) the specualtive types that live next door to us that gambled and borrowed too much.0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »I missed this the first time round!
How many more people claim benefits now than used to be the case when some of us were young and how many more different situations are covered?
Benefits are on a different planet now, that is part of the problem.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
The older generation had cheap houses, free university, well paid jobs, good pensions, free dental care, miras, low stamp duty, low council rates, low taxes and good state benefits. Now they want the young (many of whom have to take low paid jobs and/or are saddled with ever rising university debts) to:
- To buy their houses at fantasy prices.
- Work like slaves to provide them with health care and pensions in their old age
Sucks hey, don't expect it to change though as it's the older generation making all the rules.Have owned outright since Sept 2009, however I'm of the firm belief that high prices are a cancer on society, they have sucked money out of the economy, handing it to banks who've squandered it.0 -
You do have to give the boomers some leeway though:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16425522Scientists Discover why Boomers Talk Total Crap0 -
-
Oldernotwiser wrote: »Income tax at 25%, mortgage interest rates at 15%? Dream on!
The reference to tax comes straight from the Gordon Brown book of spin
You have omitted to mention changes to VAT, NI, employer's NI, council parking charges, council parking fines, petrol duty, tax on alcohol and tobacco, loss of tax subsidy on train fares, miras, council tax, water charges, IR35, hospital parking charges, care charges, dental charges, passport charges, planning approval charges, taxi licence charges, manure heap charges etc.
Interest rates
How many months did you pay mortgage rates at 15% and how long did it take for wage inflation to devalue the debt.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
