We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Amazon barcodes
Comments
-
To be honest I only know about the check digit from an IT lesson at school years ago but surely the point of the barcode is a unique identifier of the product. Pushing aside listing on Amazon, if anyone can slap any barcode on a product eventually you'd end up with two products with the same barcode on a supermarket shelf and the till won't know which is which. From having a quick Google it seems all barcodes should be authorised by the Universal Code Council?
The issue with Amazon is, if you make up a barcode and one day that happens to be officially used on say a piece of Disney merchandise, when Amazon's product team go to add the product to the site they probably just wipe your page from the site but more importantly give you a slap for misusing the barcode.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
Thanks for the help guys. They are separate items with their own identity so whilst I can have variations on Ebay it won't work the same on Amazon and would benefit search, etc to keep them separate.
They are actually imported and the person who imported them had their own product codes. Anyway as I said there's no need to have barcodes they are accepting them and going on Amazon without.
So you know it is in home/kitchen categories. I know from past experience of listing CDs and DVDs there are plenty incorrect barcodes about and on Ebay too..0 -
You're missing the point. I know they are certain number of digits long but as we have said several times already on this thread - you cannot just make up a random 13 digits for example. You should read the link ludovico posted as it explains what a barcode check digit is. A calculation (checksum) can be performed on the barcode and the check digit will confirm if its a valid barcode structure or not.johnnyboyrebel wrote: »Yes they do, when I said any number I didn't mean literally any number like 4, 796 etc.
The structure is simply that a UPC has 12 digits and an EAN has 13. Something like 0000000000001 probably wouldn't work as it is clearly made up but 0095748576830 would. Musically, Sony products always have the catalog number in the barcode with 2 zeros at the front and one at the end (at least), each label have their own format but all EAN's are always 13 digits long.
A barcode is not just a set of 13 numbers - the numbers are in groups that determine certain things about the barcode/product.
I would expect Amazon to run the checksum to confirm if a barcode is of the correct structure. This is why the random number you quoted above does not work as proved by ludovico.0 -
Exactly! This is the point that most people seem to ignore! Why risk it for the sake of a few quid?! It could ultimately lead to a ban from Amazon if ever found out.The issue with Amazon is, if you make up a barcode and one day that happens to be officially used on say a piece of Disney merchandise, when Amazon's product team go to add the product to the site they probably just wipe your page from the site but more importantly give you a slap for misusing the barcode.0 -
The issue with Amazon is, if you make up a barcode and one day that happens to be officially used on say a piece of Disney merchandise, when Amazon's product team go to add the product to the site they probably just wipe your page from the site but more importantly give you a slap for misusing the barcode.
Of course this can happen and when it does, you pull the listing and have a rethink, I guess it depends if you're planning on selling the same product long term or for a temporary period.
True, if I were to produce a new product I wouldnt just make up a barcode but we are talking about listing it on Amazon here, it doesnt really matter how it is done as long as it is listed.You're missing the point. I know they are certain number of digits long but as we have said several times already on this thread - you cannot just make up a random 13 digits for example. You should read the link ludovico posted as it explains what a barcode check digit is. A calculation (checksum) can be performed on the barcode and the check digit will confirm if its a valid barcode structure or not.
A barcode is not just a set of 13 numbers - the numbers are in groups that determine certain things about the barcode/product.
I would expect Amazon to run the checksum to confirm if a barcode is of the correct structure. This is why the random number you quoted above does not work as proved by ludovico.
As I said, I have done it myself for a company and various other times so it does work. Whether this is for CD's alone I do not know but it does.
I have worked with EAN/UPC/UPC A/UPC E etc.for a long time now0 -
Unless the punishment is a permanent ban from Amazon! I'd rather not take the risk.johnnyboyrebel wrote: »Of course this can happen and when it does, you pull the listing and have a rethink, I guess it depends if you're planning on selling the same product long term or for a temporary period.
Unless it leads to losing your account! Again, not worth the risk.johnnyboyrebel wrote: »True, if I were to produce a new product I wouldnt just make up a barcode but we are talking about listing it on Amazon here, it doesnt really matter how it is done as long as it is listed.
But didn't know about the check digit!!johnnyboyrebel wrote: »I have worked with EAN/UPC/UPC A/UPC E etc.for a long time now0 -
Officialy you should register with GS1.
Costs about £200 for the first year for unlimited barcodes, but you may need to keep paying the £100 odd quid a year to maintain them.
Still cheaper than buying individually.0 -
There are some authorised re-sellers where you can buy in smaller quantities.MoneysavingArthur wrote: »Officialy you should register with GS1.
Costs about £200 for the first year for unlimited barcodes, but you may need to keep paying the £100 odd quid a year to maintain them.
Still cheaper than buying individually.0 -
Unless the punishment is a permanent ban from Amazon! I'd rather not take the risk.
Unless it leads to losing your account! Again, not worth the risk.
But didn't know about the check digit!!
you're account will not get closed because you have used an 'incorrect' barcode for listing an item so stop scaremongering.
I am not getting into any debate over barcodes...0 -
How the hell do you know?!?!? Its bad advice to say that people should use any old barcode or any old number and is actually against Amazons T&Cs...johnnyboyrebel wrote: »you're account will not get closed because you have used an 'incorrect' barcode for listing an itemProhibited Seller Activities and Actions
Do not list your item against a detail page with a different ISBN, UPC or other external identifier. Only list an item against a detail page with the same ISBN or UPC as your item.
Source - http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200770190
*edit* Just found a more appropriate T&C...Product Detail Page Rules
The use of false product identification information in product detail pages, including EAN/UPC codes, is prohibited.
Source - http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_left_sib?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200781460
Can't argue with that!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
