We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Nottingham Building Society/Bradford and Bingley PPI

DRS1101
DRS1101 Posts: 6 Forumite
edited 3 January 2012 at 10:18PM in Reclaim PPI & other insurance
Please can anyone advise...I took out a mortgage with Bradford and Bingley in about 1998 and then changed mortgage providers in 2007 to Nottingham Building Society. I work full time for the NHS and get 6 months full, 6 months half pay which would have applied to both mortgages. I paid around £20 per month PPI on the Bradford and Bingley and when I changed providers to the Nottingham, paid approx £25 per month PPI to London and Edinburgh through the Nottingham. I changed mortgages last January to the Yorkshire bank with a whopping redemption fee to be paid to Nottingham (can this be claimed back does anyone know) When taking out both mortgages I thought i had to have the PPI when taking out both of the mortgages. Is this worth looking at do you think? Really grateful for advise/comments. Thank you. x

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,375 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I changed mortgages last January to the Yorkshire bank with a whopping redemption fee to be paid to Nottingham (can this be claimed back does anyone know)

    No. Early repayment charges are your choice to take on and your choice if you redeem early. They are a valid and fair charge.
    When taking out both mortgages I thought i had to have the PPI when taking out both of the mortgages.

    A misconception is not grounds for complaint.
    Is this worth looking at do you think? Really grateful for advise/comments.

    The 1998 case may be difficult. Especially if you used a broker/adviser rahter than buying via lender (it is pre-regulation for broker/advisers).

    The 2007 case is much easier as that had to comply with modern rules and in 2007 it should have been checked.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thank you. I am actually using a claims company who have taken the B&B details. I won't hold out much hope for that one then. I took the mortgage through our local B&B branch. When you say the 1997 case is much easier, do you think this sounds more positive? Thanks again for your advise, very much appreciated
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.