📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

B & M Stores - charging for 100% free teabags!

Options
24

Comments

  • aldredd
    aldredd Posts: 925 Forumite
    I think most of the posts here are missing the point the op is making. If you are selling a pack of say 80 for £1 and the same pack showing 100% free for a higher price, I suspect legally you are on a sticky wicket. The pack showing extra free shouldn't be costing more than the pack without the extra free.

    Agreed

    Had a similar situation once where a product I was interested in came with Interest Free Credit available - yet when selecting this option, it cost more than buying it outright.
  • Forwandert
    Forwandert Posts: 1,211 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    At a discount retailer I used to work at if an item with x% free was coming into store and the sales price was higher than the usual shelf price we had to remove all the original product off sale until the promo had sold through, usually head office would email and warn of possible pricing issues with trading standards if we didn't.
  • zenmaster
    zenmaster Posts: 3,151 Forumite
    Pedantically, if it states "100% free" then it should cost nothing.
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Just go to 'Home Bargains' they sell Tetley 100's box for £1, good cuppa good price.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • kitschkitty
    kitschkitty Posts: 3,177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    As mentioned above the 100% extra free will be based on the manufacturers RRP, so if B&Ms price is below RRP they may feel it's within their remit to charge more than they do for the standard packs which they have so heavily discounted.

    As a customer I totally agree it's a very bad way to do things, and not clearly labeling it on the shelf is even worse. I think it's basically stupid for them to have both products on sale at the same time if they want to charge different prices for them.
    A waist is a terrible thing to mind.
  • texranger
    texranger Posts: 1,845 Forumite
    edited 1 January 2012 at 11:13AM
    aldredd wrote: »
    according to who?

    the stores and the retail consortiums and this is how the normally are, but some dont work out that way.
  • texranger
    texranger Posts: 1,845 Forumite
    edited 1 January 2012 at 12:47PM
    Forwandert wrote: »
    At a discount retailer I used to work at if an item with x% free was coming into store and the sales price was higher than the usual shelf price we had to remove all the original product off sale until the promo had sold through, usually head office would email and warn of possible pricing issues with trading standards if we didn't.

    true as a retailer ( store owner) if i get a special deal/offer from a supplier i either remove the full price goods off the shelf and stock with the special offer goods or if their is not a lot of the full price items in stock then if profit is still made i will just add these to the promo if. if i have a lot of the full porice items in stock ( more full; boxes then i will just sell these before i sell the promo items.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    texranger wrote: »
    the stores and the retail consortiums and this is how the normally are, but some dont work out that way.

    I read an article (I think it was on the Daily Mail website) not too long ago about a journalist reporting on these sorts of problems, including the multi-pack 'deal'. Having also seen it a number of times in supermarket chains, I also agree it most certainly does happen.

    Whether it's an "accident" or not is the question :)
  • aldredd
    aldredd Posts: 925 Forumite
    texranger wrote: »
    the stores and the retail consortiums and this is how the normally are, but some dont work out that way.

    But it's not at simple as that - it's the supplier which sets the cost price, and the retailer will then have a standard margin they want to apply on top of that to get to a retail price. (Plus others factors such as price competitiveness etc)

    If the supplier offers a better cost price for the smaller pack size - usually because they shift more of them (remember supply & demand and all that), then the retailer will usually reflect this in the retail prices - hence why a bigger pack isn't always better value - it's not the retailer intentionally trying to scam customers.

    Coffee is often a good example of this - a (for example) 200g jar of Nescafe usually work out cheaper (per g) than a catering size tub - because they sell more of the jars and so offer a better price.

    Where the pack is marked as 'better value' or 'x amount free) then absolutely this should be true - but people wrongly assume / think that a bigger pack must be better value.
  • withabix
    withabix Posts: 9,508 Forumite
    On the box with 100% extra free, does it have a reference to the RRP? (usually in very small print).

    B&M are doing nothing wrong by selling that box for more anyway. They didn't print the packaging.
    British Ex-pat in British Columbia!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.