We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Please help MSE test the Celebrity Consumer Rights Quiz

Options
Former_MSE_Alana
Former_MSE_Alana Posts: 252 Forumite
edited 28 December 2011 at 7:35PM in Site feedback and Forum Help
Hi folks,

We've compiled a new 'Celebrity Consumer Rights' to test your knowledge. We're still tweaking a few things, but it should be almost ready and we'd really appreciate it if you could spend 5 minutes testing it out for us.

Please reply here if you notice any problems.

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/quiz/consumer-rights/

Many thanks,

MSE Alana
«13

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,330 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    got 8/10 not as bad as i thought id be.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    9/10 - you got me on Pippa. :(
  • In that case I think it's playing up - I just finished and apparently 15 out of 15 people all got 100%!
  • Q1 fails to reflect that a store cannot exclude the consumer's statutory right to return faulty goods, the statement in itself would be unlawful.

    Q4 fails to specify whether the retailer's t&cs state who pays the return charge. I also disagree that you will 'usually' have to pay for the return, quite the opposite to my own experience. Also it is 'the', not 'he'.

    Q6, 'now it's now stopped working'???

    Q9, 'Lady Gaga bought a karaoke machine ...'
  • meher
    meher Posts: 15,910 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    the questions are cleverly :snow_grin worded
  • mo786uk
    mo786uk Posts: 1,379 Forumite
    I would dispute the fact that a bank statement is on its own a replacement for a receipt for the purposes of the SOGA.

    If you have bought multiple items it may not be (as it wont correspond with the items price) - and even if you bought 1 item it doesnt NECESSARILY prove you bought the exact item you are taking back - but I spose in rality it does most of the timne.

    I believe there is also some debate about whether totally free gifts coem with SOGA rights are they are not being bought........
  • halibut2209
    halibut2209 Posts: 4,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yup, Q4 is incomplete with the choices. You only need to pay the return costs IF it states you must in the T&C AND if that is in a durable format. A website is NOT considered durable. It must be in writing or an email.
    One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.
  • Thanks for your feedback so far :).

    We're still tweaking it, so let us know if there's anything else.

    MSE Sally
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Q1 fails to reflect that a store cannot exclude the consumer's statutory right to return faulty goods, the statement in itself would be unlawful.

    Q4 fails to specify whether the retailer's t&cs state who pays the return charge. I also disagree that you will 'usually' have to pay for the return, quite the opposite to my own experience. Also it is 'the', not 'he'.

    Q6, 'now it's now stopped working'???

    Q9, 'Lady Gaga bought a karaoke machine ...'

    Not quite sure i would agree with your first point about Q1. Says in the question they're too small (ergo not faulty) and then says in the answer "You only have rights if it's faulty" and then goes on to explain that if the stores policy allows the return (and its not excluded) then you can also enforce this as it would have formed part of the contract.

    If for Q6 you mean that it doesnt state why it has stopped working, it does then say the shop agree its faulty (thus giving the impression - to me anyway - that it was inherent and not misuse.

    Not sure what your issue is with Q9, unless its just the irony/facepalm factor.

    Q4 is spot on though :D They'd be entitled to £36 if they weren't provided with the necessary information.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • meher
    meher Posts: 15,910 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    May be some questions don't offer more options than we would have liked to see but by the end of the quiz and revisiting the answers, we learn the spirit and essence of consumer rights and law concerned. The quiz is kept simple and made interesting. I'd add nothing more to it because when it is complicated, the fun element would be gone.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.