We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Comet
Options

simonholmes
Posts: 1 Newbie
I bought a Beko bult in oven on Nov 2, 2010. I purchased it with my debit card. I did not take out the extended warranty. It has stopped working and Comet want to send and engineer out to assessit and if oisible fix it, but wnat to charge me. Surely the product should last more than a year, what should I do?:(
0
Comments
-
What do they want to charge you for? If they're charging you for an assessment to see if the fault is inherent, this is perfectly reasonable. If the engineer deems it to be an inherent fault, you will get the cost of the assessment back, plus you should get the item repaired for free.
Alternatively, you can arrange (and pay for) your own assessment. The same rules apply - if the fault is deemed inherent, Comet should reimburse you the cost of the assessment plus repair your oven.
You won't be able to avoid this assessment because the goods are over six months old. Ask Comet to clarify exactly what the charge encompasses and ask for assurance that a) they'll reimburse you the cost of the assessment if the fault is deemed inherent and b) if the fault is not deemed inherent that you're under no obligation to pay for a repair (you might decide instead to buy a new oven, for example)."Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.0 -
fluffnutter wrote: »...and b) if the fault is not deemed inherent that you're under no obligation to pay for a repair (you might decide instead to buy a new oven, for example).
As Fluffnutter says, it's really important to understand what you are being charged for.0 -
But in this situation I believe the consumer is still responsible for the 'assessment' fee, so it may well be more economical to have the guy repair the thing while he is there 'assessing'... especially if that assessment fee becomes part of the repair charge.
Agreed. I wasn't explicit in my original post, but if they fault is deemed not inherent, then the assessment fee must be paid by the consumer."Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards