We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
who owns items in rented property?
Comments
-
1) If the property has been repossesed via the courts (the only way it can be done) one of 2 things can happen: ...spidereyes wrote: »Apologies - the letter was from the landlord, saying control was now with the bank and gave me a contact at the bank should I have any queries.
Don't pay rent to either party now until ownership is resolved - but do keep the money to one side.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
DVardysShadow wrote: »Could also be a voluntary repo, which I don't think would require a court. And this would, I think would maintain the tenancy.
Looks like LL has gone for voluntary repo, unilaterally. But bank don't seem to have accepted yet - possibly because of the tenancy.
Don't pay rent to either party now until ownership is resolved - but do keep the money to one side.
Thanks,
Should I in which case write to both LL and bank stating reasons for not paying rent in the short term, or is this something that I should leave until chased?
If needs be Ive drafted a letter to both which outlines my reasons for non payment which I would appreciate if someone could cast an eye over.
Annoyingly I work within a division of a solicitors firm, just my particular office doesn't deal with conveyancing issues, otherwise I would have asked for some advice there.
I appreciate everyones help here0 -
spidereyes wrote: »Thanks,
Should I in which case write to both LL and bank stating reasons for not paying rent in the short term, or is this something that I should leave until chased?
If needs be Ive drafted a letter to both which outlines my reasons for non payment which I would appreciate if someone could cast an eye over.
Annoyingly I work within a division of a solicitors firm, just my particular office doesn't deal with conveyancing issues, otherwise I would have asked for some advice there.
I appreciate everyones help hereHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
You mentioned repairs above. You could include them too. Though that might disuade the bank from accepting the liability.
You have not let us know
* what tenancy (and therefore security) you have
* whether the LL had CTL/BTL (though I'm guessing yes since the bank seems to know of your presence)0 -
Please tell mw you got proper legal advice. You might think you are being protected, but actually your rights are few, and you need to make sure you have everything in writing, this included. I don't imagine the landlord of multiple repoed properties would want all those fridges. But make sure.0
-
Just wanted to update on this thread -
This afternoon we had a letter through the door addressed to 'the occupier'. Opened it up and it was a letter from the bank - filled with stupid sentences that make no sense to me really.
I *THINK* what its saying is that the ex LL has given up all interest in the property, all rights to my teancy and all rights to the money from the rent.
Its telling me I have 5 days to acknowledge receipt of the letter and to sign that I agree to what it says etc and telling me that until further notice I still need to keep paying my rent to the (ex) landlord's bank account, which I admit I just simply do not understand - Im assuming because the bank now has control of it however this is whats making me uneasy - there is still no news on a management company being instructed however, even more things now need fixing at the house and Im seeing no sign of this actually being done. Its been over a month now and its getting a bit of a joke. Why the hell should I be paying X company when they arn't doing anything to fix my damn house!
My question is though (maybe one for CAB?) if someone else becomes my landlord is there no way out of the tenancy agreement? The bank are saying my tenancy is still valid and that my tenancy will remain under the current terms however my tenancy agreement is with a company which say they no longer have any responsibility to my property and therfore in theory at least I see it that means my tenancy becomes void? Surley without signing anything (unless this is what this letter I have to sign from the bank is about) I don't need to accept anyone else to become my landlord?0 -
Unless you tell us what the letter says it is hard to advise.filled with stupid sentences that make no sense to me really but it's basically telling me I have 5 days to acknowledge receipt of the letter and to sign that I agree to what it says
Either the bank has repossessed, and is your landlord, in which case you pay THEM (but them telling you to pay the old LL indicates this has not happened yet) OR
They have not repossessed, in which case I would follow the advice we have previously given you - do NOT pay the rent, but set it aside and write telling the LL what you are doing.
Repairs - as said before, these will probobly not be dealt with till ownership is sorted out. But you should report them all in writing, ideally to both the LL and the bank. If urgent, do them yourself as advised before.0 -
The tenancy is still valid, the ownership of the house makes no difference to the tenancy. You should now write to the bank and tell them of the repairs needed and ask for a timescale of the works being done, you still have the same rights to this.
If the letter is a valid one from the bank then just pay to the same account as instructed, the bank will be in control of it anyway and there is a good chance any funds lodged to it will just be swallowed up by a huge overdraft.
If you want out of the agreement you could ask to be released from the agreement early, there is a good chance they will want you out at the earliest opportunity anyway, especially as the place need repairs done.0 -
The letter says
"we give notice under a debenture dated 18th September 2006 that XXXX charged and assigned to the bank all thier right title and interest in and to your lease and the moneys from time to time due to them under the lease of the property.
We irrevocably and unconditionally instruct you until you recieve notice from us to the contrary that any rent payable by you under the lease ....... is payable to XXXX" (my ex landlord) and they then give me the account details.
"Please confirm your agreement to these instructions and authorisations by signing the enclosed acknowledgment........"
"You may be liable to eviction proceedings should you continue to pay any rent payable under the lease to any person or account rather than the bank details above"
The acknowledgment then says
" we confirm that we have not recieved notice that any third party has or will have any right or interest in or has made and will be making on or taking any action in respect of, the rights of the borrower as defined in the notice under the lease and we shall continue to pay all rent payable by us under the lease into the rent account as defined in the notice and we shall continue to pay those monies into the rent account until we recieve your written instructions to the contrary
To me that just says they want me to continue paying my ex LL. Im assuming as Bris said above then it its because they have control of the account. But to me that still doesn't say whats going on with my propertry0 -
What's going on with the property is that the bank will be taking over responsibility for your tenancy. Once that happens you may or may not receive instructions to pay your rent into another bank account.
This sounds like a BTL empire gone to the wall. Sooner or later the bank will be responsible for any maintenance and repairs, normally through a property management company appointed by the Official Receiver. Then you'll pay your rent to them and they will be the ones coordinating repairs. I worked for such a Man. Co. a while back and they were repairing roofs, putting new double-glazing in, replacing washing-machines and all sorts. It doesn't have to be a completely bleak outlook.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards