📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

F.A.R.T opinions on time scales

Options
Adam_Dingle
Adam_Dingle Posts: 1 Newbie
edited 21 December 2011 at 6:45PM in Consumer rights
Hi All,

I've got a Toshiba 46" LCD tv that has just gone on the blink. Repair-man tells me it's the screen and therefore it isn't worth the repair.

My question is, and using the FART acronim, is two years and 9 months past a 'reasonable amount of time'? This was a £700 (down from £1200) purchase for us at that time. It came from Tesco's but we didn't take form of extended warranty.

My own feeling is that we're too far gone, but any opinions would be great.

Thanks Adam.

Comments

  • I wouldn't say so, your difficulty comes in proving the fault is inherent.

    If you can get an engineer to document that it is then you should expect a proportionate (but not linear) refund. Given a life of (say) 5 years I would expect a refund in the region of ~£200-£250.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.