We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Buying flat, mislead on length remaining on lease

2

Comments

  • if they genuinely thought the lease was 109, that's what they must have based the price on.

    Likelihood is the estate agents didn't even think/ask about lease length but just valued it according to its accommodation, condition and facilities.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • Whether the lease is 70 years or 110 years, that is a short lease and significantly reduces the value of the flat IMO (relative to if the lease were, say, 999 years). Personally, I'd walk.
  • Likelihood is the estate agents didn't even think/ask about lease length but just valued it according to its accommodation, condition and facilities.

    And what is implicit in that, is a lease length which would not affect the value derived from the assumptions above.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And what is implicit in that, is a lease length which would not affect the value derived from the assumptions above.

    As a previous owner of a leasehold flat, I think that ALL adverts for such properties should be required to show the number of years left on the lease. Potential buyers who are attracted to slightly cheaper properties shuld be able to see whether this is because of a shorter lease or whether the flat simply needs refurbishment/redecorating.
    When I sold my flat, a buyer said I was asking too much because another similarly priced property viewed had been more recently decorated. However I later learnt that my flat had had more years left on the lease. As a buyer, a longer lease would be more important to me.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Whether the lease is 70 years or 110 years, that is a short lease and significantly reduces the value of the flat IMO (relative to if the lease were, say, 999 years). Personally, I'd walk.

    Except that in London this would be pretty unlikely. When I bought my old flat, it had a new lease of 99 years which seems pretty standard. I sold it when it had 87 years left which was enough to not really affect the price. I then went for freehold, much more preferable but very difficult for a first time buyer.
  • PJD
    PJD Posts: 582 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's going to cost the best part of £10,000 to renew that lease is it not? And I dont think it's a quick process?

    What's the latest? Is the seller going to renew?
  • Ulfar
    Ulfar Posts: 1,309 Forumite
    Vendor is taking the !!!! on this one, you may get the lease length wrong by up to ten years but not 69. They will have been more than aware of the lease length being 40 years.

    They have no hope of selling this flat to anyone requiring a mortgage, time to negotiate hard.
  • HRV
    HRV Posts: 290 Forumite
    My old flat only ever had something like 110 yrs on the lease- when i got it i wasnt properly informed by solicitor that it was borderline at 75 yrs- I had to extend my lease before selling- it cost 10 000 all in icluding fees- 7500 for extension + all the costs. Was not a quick process as I had to negotiate the terms as they were offering me less than ideal terms for more money (saved 1000+ and paid the negotiator about 300 (fee only payable if he made me a saving)- so worth the money) then had to do all the paper work- think about 4 months in all.


    I put it on the market twice- on no occassion was i asked to prove the length of the lease!

    I also had a issue with a house i was purchasing- did surveys etc and solicitors- even had a date to move- then my solicitor asked if they had the money in place to pay the local authority- as it was ex council and theyd owned it less than 5 yrs- they hadnt realised- withdrew it from market- No house for me- just bills- sadly i think thats just the way it is :-(
  • Ulfar
    Ulfar Posts: 1,309 Forumite
    Only 75 years on a lease is bad as you have broken the 80 years barrier where the costs escalate exponentially. 40 years is diabolical, I can see the OP having to walk away from this one.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How long were they required to keep their ex council house before selling it? I know there is a restriction but don't know the details.

    re. leasehold flats: I would never buy one of these or even make an offer without knowing how many years were left on the lease. It would have to be min 85-90 for me to buy one. I would also want to research the freeholder and find out additional info from other residents. Mine was either a crook or simply incompetent.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.